BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis has spread among hospitalised patients in South Africa, but the epidemic-level effect of hospital-based infection control strategies remains unknown. We modelled the plausible effect of rapidly available infection control strategies on the overall course of the XDR tuberculosis epidemic in a rural area of South Africa. METHODS: We investigated the effect of administrative, environmental, and personal infection control measures on the epidemic trajectory of XDR tuberculosis in the rural community of Tugela Ferry. Assessments were done with a mathematical model incorporating over 2 years of longitudinal inpatient and community-based data. The model simulated inpatient airborne tuberculosis transmission, community tuberculosis transmission, and the effect of HIV and antiretroviral therapy. FINDINGS: If no new interventions are introduced, about 1300 cases of XDR tuberculosis are predicted to occur in the area of Tugela Ferry by the end of 2012, more than half of which are likely to be nosocomially transmitted. Mask use alone would avert fewer than 10% of cases in the overall epidemic, but could prevent a large proportion of cases of XDR tuberculosis in hospital staff. The combination of mask use with reduced hospitalisation time and a shift to outpatient therapy could prevent nearly a third of XDR tuberculosis cases. Supplementing this approach with improved ventilation, rapid drug resistance testing, HIV treatment, and tuberculosis isolation facilities could avert 48% of XDR tuberculosis cases (range 34-50%) by the end of 2012. However, involuntary detention could result in an unexpected rise in incidence due to restricted isolation capacity. INTERPRETATION: A synergistic combination of available nosocomial infection control strategies could prevent nearly half of XDR tuberculosis cases, even in a resource-limited setting. XDR tuberculosis transmission will probably continue in the community, indicating the need to develop and implement parallel community-based programmes.
BACKGROUND: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis has spread among hospitalised patients in South Africa, but the epidemic-level effect of hospital-based infection control strategies remains unknown. We modelled the plausible effect of rapidly available infection control strategies on the overall course of the XDR tuberculosis epidemic in a rural area of South Africa. METHODS: We investigated the effect of administrative, environmental, and personal infection control measures on the epidemic trajectory of XDR tuberculosis in the rural community of Tugela Ferry. Assessments were done with a mathematical model incorporating over 2 years of longitudinal inpatient and community-based data. The model simulated inpatient airborne tuberculosis transmission, community tuberculosis transmission, and the effect of HIV and antiretroviral therapy. FINDINGS: If no new interventions are introduced, about 1300 cases of XDR tuberculosis are predicted to occur in the area of Tugela Ferry by the end of 2012, more than half of which are likely to be nosocomially transmitted. Mask use alone would avert fewer than 10% of cases in the overall epidemic, but could prevent a large proportion of cases of XDR tuberculosis in hospital staff. The combination of mask use with reduced hospitalisation time and a shift to outpatient therapy could prevent nearly a third of XDR tuberculosis cases. Supplementing this approach with improved ventilation, rapid drug resistance testing, HIV treatment, and tuberculosis isolation facilities could avert 48% of XDR tuberculosis cases (range 34-50%) by the end of 2012. However, involuntary detention could result in an unexpected rise in incidence due to restricted isolation capacity. INTERPRETATION: A synergistic combination of available nosocomial infection control strategies could prevent nearly half of XDR tuberculosis cases, even in a resource-limited setting. XDR tuberculosis transmission will probably continue in the community, indicating the need to develop and implement parallel community-based programmes.
Authors: Sebastien Gagneux; Clara Davis Long; Peter M Small; Tran Van; Gary K Schoolnik; Brendan J M Bohannan Journal: Science Date: 2006-06-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Carole Mitnick; Jaime Bayona; Eda Palacios; Sonya Shin; Jennifer Furin; Felix Alcántara; Epifanio Sánchez; Madeleny Sarria; Mercedes Becerra; Mary C Smith Fawzi; Saidi Kapiga; Donna Neuberg; James H Maguire; Jim Yong Kim; Paul Farmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Roderick Escombe; Clarissa Oeser; Robert H Gilman; Marcos Navincopa; Eduardo Ticona; Carlos Martínez; Luz Caviedes; Patricia Sheen; Armando Gonzalez; Catherine Noakes; David A J Moore; Jon S Friedland; Carlton A Evans Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sanjay Basu; Gerald H Friedland; Jan Medlock; Jason R Andrews; N Sarita Shah; Neel R Gandhi; Anthony Moll; Prashini Moodley; A Willem Sturm; Alison P Galvani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David W Dowdy; Richard E Chaisson; Gary Maartens; Elizabeth L Corbett; Susan E Dorman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Roderick Escombe; David A J Moore; Robert H Gilman; Marcos Navincopa; Eduardo Ticona; Bailey Mitchell; Catherine Noakes; Carlos Martínez; Patricia Sheen; Rocio Ramirez; Willi Quino; Armando Gonzalez; Jon S Friedland; Carlton A Evans Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Kwonjune J Seung; David B Omatayo; Salmaan Keshavjee; Jennifer J Furin; Paul E Farmer; Hind Satti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240