BACKGROUND: This study compared metabolic, hormonal and lipid profiles before and during use of a contraceptive vaginal ring (RING) releasing 15 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 120 mcg etonogestrel per day NuvaRing, Organon USA Inc., Roseland, NJ versus a low-dose oral contraceptive (PILL) containing 20 mcg EE and 100 mcg levonorgestrel daily (Aviane, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pomona, NY). STUDY DESIGN:Sixty-five women were randomized to either the RING or PILL treatment for five cycles. In the pretreatment cycle (Cycle Days 2-5) and during Weeks 2 and 3 of the fifth treatment cycle, a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed. Baseline samples were used to evaluate basal hormonal, metabolic and lipid levels. RESULTS:Forty-two women completed the study. Basal insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was slightly decreased, whereas a significant reduction in the insulin sensitivity index (IS(OGTT)) was found in women on PILL therapy compared to those in the RING group (p<.035). Pancreatic beta-cell function was not significantly altered with either treatment. CONCLUSION: The lower-dose, nonoral hormonal RING had a lesser impact on carbohydrate metabolism and greater reduction of free androgen and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels than PILL treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study compared metabolic, hormonal and lipid profiles before and during use of a contraceptive vaginal ring (RING) releasing 15 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 120 mcg etonogestrel per day NuvaRing, Organon USA Inc., Roseland, NJ versus a low-dose oral contraceptive (PILL) containing 20 mcg EE and 100 mcg levonorgestrel daily (Aviane, Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pomona, NY). STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-five women were randomized to either the RING or PILL treatment for five cycles. In the pretreatment cycle (Cycle Days 2-5) and during Weeks 2 and 3 of the fifth treatment cycle, a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed. Baseline samples were used to evaluate basal hormonal, metabolic and lipid levels. RESULTS: Forty-two women completed the study. Basal insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was slightly decreased, whereas a significant reduction in the insulin sensitivity index (IS(OGTT)) was found in women on PILL therapy compared to those in the RING group (p<.035). Pancreatic beta-cell function was not significantly altered with either treatment. CONCLUSION: The lower-dose, nonoral hormonal RING had a lesser impact on carbohydrate metabolism and greater reduction of free androgen and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels than PILL treatment.
Authors: Christopher McConville; James M Smith; Clare F McCoy; Priya Srinivasan; James Mitchell; Angela Holder; Ron A Otten; Salvatore Butera; Gustavo F Doncel; David R Friend; R Karl Malcolm Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.617
Authors: Priya Srinivasan; Chuong Dinh; Jining Zhang; Chou-Pong Pau; Janet M McNicholl; Yungtai Lo; Betsy C Herold; Ryan Teller; Patrick Kiser; James M Smith Journal: J Med Primatol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 0.667
Authors: Britta N Torgrimson; Jessica R Meendering; Nicole P Miller; Paul F Kaplan; Christopher T Minson Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Lina S Silva-Bermudez; Freddy J K Toloza; Maria C Perez-Matos; Russell J de Souza; Laura Banfield; Andrea Vargas-Villanueva; Carlos O Mendivil Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 3.335
Authors: Y Zimmerman; M J C Eijkemans; H J T Coelingh Bennink; M A Blankenstein; B C J M Fauser Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 15.610