Literature DB >> 17962229

Tactile interaction with taste localization: influence of gustatory quality and intensity.

Juyun Lim1, Barry G Green.   

Abstract

Taste is always accompanied by tactile stimulation, but little is known about how touch interacts with taste. One exception is evidence that taste can be "referred" to nearby tactile stimulation. It was recently found (Lim J, and Green BG. 2007. The psychophysical relationship between bitter taste and burning sensation: evidence of qualitative similarity. Chem Senses. 32:31-39) that spatial discrimination of taste was poorer for bitterness than for other tastes when the perceived intensities were matched. We hypothesized that this difference may have been caused by greater referral of bitterness by touch. The present study tested this hypothesis by comparing localization of quinine sulfate and sucrose under conditions that minimized and maximized the opportunity for referral. In both conditions, stimulation was produced by 5 cotton swabs spaced 1 cm apart and arranged in an arc to enable simultaneous contact with the front edge of the tongue. Only one swab contained the taste stimulus, whereas the rest were saturated with deionized water. In both conditions, the swabs were stroked up-and-down against the tongue 5 times. Subjects were asked to identify which swab contained the taste stimulus 1) 5 s after the fifth stroke (touch-removed condition) and 2) immediately at the end of the fifth stroke, with the swabs still in contact with the tongue (touch-maintained condition). Ratings of taste intensity were obtained to assess the possible effect of perceived intensity on spatial localization. Taste localization was surprisingly accurate, especially for sucrose, with errors of localization in the range of 1 cm or less. For both stimuli, localization tended to be poorer when the tactile stimulus was present while subjects made their judgments, but the difference between conditions was significant only for the lower concentration of quinine. The results are discussed in terms of both the surprisingly good spatial acuity of taste and the possibility of having a close perceptual relationship between touch and bitter taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17962229     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  9 in total

1.  Superadditive opercular activation to food flavor is mediated by enhanced temporal and limbic coupling.

Authors:  Janina Seubert; Kathrin Ohla; Yoshiko Yokomukai; Thilo Kellermann; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Somatosensory factors in taste perception: effects of active tasting and solution temperature.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-05-17

3.  Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 5.  An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste.

Authors:  Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Oral sensory nerve damage: Causes and consequences.

Authors:  Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  The tongue map and the spatial modulation of taste perception.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-03-18

8.  Gustatory dysfunction in relation to circumvallate papilla's taste buds structure upon unilateral maxillary molar extraction in Wistar rats: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Sana Mostafa; Heba M Hakam; Amal El-Motayam
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-09-20

9.  Regional Variation of Bitter Taste and Aftertaste in Humans.

Authors:  Molly J Higgins; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.160

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.