Literature DB >> 17961607

DNA repair in response to anthracycline-DNA adducts: a role for both homologous recombination and nucleotide excision repair.

Damian M S Spencer1, Rebecca A Bilardi, Tad H Koch, Glen C Post, Jordan W Nafie, Ken-Ichi Kimura, Suzanne M Cutts, Don R Phillips.   

Abstract

Doxorubicin, a widely used anthracycline anticancer agent, acts as a topoisomerase II poison but can also form formaldehyde-mediated DNA adducts. This has led to the development of doxorubicin derivatives such as doxoform, which can readily form adducts with DNA. This work aimed to determine which DNA repair pathways are involved in the recognition and possible repair of anthracycline-DNA adducts. Cell lines lacking functional proteins involved in each of the five main repair pathways, mismatch repair (MMR), base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) were examined for sensitivity to various anthracycline adduct-forming treatments. The treatments used were doxorubicin, barminomycin (a model adduct-forming anthracycline) and doxoform (a doxorubicin-formaldehyde conjugate). Cells with deficiencies in MMR, BER and NHEJ were equally sensitive to adduct-forming treatments compared to wild type cells and therefore these pathways are unlikely to play a role in the repair of these adducts. Some cells with deficiencies in the NER pathway (specifically, those lacking functional XPB, XPD and XPG), displayed tolerance to adducts induced by both barminomycin and doxoform and also exhibited a decreased level of apoptosis in response to adduct-forming treatments. Conversely, two HR deficient cell lines were shown to be more sensitive to barminomycin and doxoform than HR proficient cells, indicating that this pathway is also involved in the repair response to anthracycline-DNA adducts. These results suggest an unusual damage response pathway to anthracycline adducts involving both NER and HR that could be used to optimise cancer therapy for tumours with either high levels of NER or defective HR. Tumours with either of these characteristics would be predicted to respond particularly well to anthracycline-DNA adduct-forming treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17961607     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  24 in total

1.  LEDGF (p75) promotes DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Mads Daugaard; Annika Baude; Kasper Fugger; Lou Klitgaard Povlsen; Halfdan Beck; Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Nikolaj H T Petersen; Poul H B Sorensen; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Mikkel Rohde; Marja Jäättelä
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Pathogenic Germline Mutations in DNA Repair Genes in Combination With Cancer Treatment Exposures and Risk of Subsequent Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Authors:  Na Qin; Zhaoming Wang; Qi Liu; Nan Song; Carmen L Wilson; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Kyla Shelton; John Easton; Heather Mulder; Dennis Kennetz; Michael N Edmonson; Michael C Rusch; James R Downing; Melissa M Hudson; Kim E Nichols; Jinghui Zhang; Leslie L Robison; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Circular synthesized CRISPR/Cas gRNAs for functional interrogations in the coding and noncoding genome.

Authors:  Martin Wegner; Valentina Diehl; Verena Bittl; Rahel de Bruyn; Svenja Wiechmann; Yves Matthess; Marie Hebel; Michael Gb Hayes; Simone Schaubeck; Christopher Benner; Sven Heinz; Anja Bremm; Ivan Dikic; Andreas Ernst; Manuel Kaulich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Low Recombination Proficiency Score (RPS) Predicts Heightened Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sean P Pitroda; Riyue Bao; Jorge Andrade; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Philip P Connell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Role of XRCC3, XRCC1 and XPD single-nucleotide polymorphisms in survival outcomes following adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E Castro; D Olmos; A Garcia; J J Cruz; R González-Sarmiento
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Characterization of environmental chemicals with potential for DNA damage using isogenic DNA repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines.

Authors:  Kimiyo N Yamamoto; Kouji Hirota; Koichi Kono; Shunichi Takeda; Srilatha Sakamuru; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher P Austin; Kristine L Witt; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as a novel therapeutic target in cancer.

Authors:  Christina M Annunziata; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Voreloxin is an anticancer quinolone derivative that intercalates DNA and poisons topoisomerase II.

Authors:  Rachael E Hawtin; David E Stockett; Jo Ann W Byl; Robert S McDowell; Tan Nguyen; Michelle R Arkin; Andrew Conroy; Wenjin Yang; Neil Osheroff; Judith A Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Increased Oxidative Damage and Reduced DNA Repair Enzyme XPD Involvement in High Glucose-Mediated Enhancement of Levobupivacaine-Induced Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  ZhongJie Liu; Wei Zhao; QingGuo Zhang; LuYing Lai; Shan Jiang; Jing Zhang; ShiYuan Xu
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.996

10.  Cellular Recognition and Repair of Monofunctional-Intercalative Platinum--DNA Adducts.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Jimmy Suryadi; Ulrich Bierbach
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.