Literature DB >> 17960770

Children's views on their involvement in clinical research.

Hélène Chappuy1, François Doz, Stéphane Blanche, Jean-Claude Gentet, Jean-Marc Tréluyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the level of children's understanding of informed consent in clinical trials and factors that may influence these processes.
DESIGN: Twenty nine children who were included in clinical trials for treatment of cancer or HIV, were offered the possibility to complete a semidirective interview, with parental permission.
METHODS: Children's understanding was measured by a score of 0-9 including items required to obtain a valid consent according to French and European legislations.
RESULTS: Children were 8.5-18 years old (13.6 +/- 2.8 years). The higher percentage of understanding was obtained for the study objectives (n = 18, 62%), the risks (n = 17, 58%), the potential self-benefits (n = 18, 62%) and the potential benefits to other children (n = 17, 58%). The lower percentage of understanding was obtained for the procedures (n = 5, 17%), the possibility of alternative treatments (n = 9, 31%), the duration of participation (n = 6, 21%), their right to withdraw (n = 6, 21%), and the voluntary participation (n = 6, 21%). Sixteen children (55%) thought that the given information was adequate. Understanding was significantly correlated with child's age (r = 0.65; P = 0.0001) and the mean score was higher in patients over 14 years old compared to patients under the age of 14 (4.4 +/- 2.4, n = 14 vs. 2.6 +/- 2.6, n = 15, P < 0.05). The mean score was also higher in children when informed consent was sought some time after the diagnosis (>7 days) rather than at the same time (<7 days) (score: 4.14 +/- 2.59 n = 21 vs. 1.87 +/- 2.03 n = 8; P = 0.03). The clarity of information perceived by children did not influence their understanding (score: 3.6 +/- 2.6 n = 14 vs. 3.5 +/- 2.7 n = 15; P = 0.91).
CONCLUSION: Children have an incomplete understanding of the elements included in the informed consent forms. Understanding is related to age and timing of informed consent. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17960770     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  12 in total

1.  Older Adolescents' Understanding of Participant Rights in the BlackBerry Project, a Longitudinal Ambulatory Assessment Study.

Authors:  Diana J Meter; Samuel E Ehrenreich; Christopher Carker; Elinor Flynn; Marion K Underwood
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2019-09

2.  Adolescents' understanding of research concepts: a focus group study.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Celeste A Lemay; Margaret H Kearney; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-06

3.  Children's views on unlicensed/off-label paediatric prescribing and paediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Tareq Mukattash; Karen Trew; Ahmed F Hawwa; James C McElnay
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nguyen Thanh Tam; Nguyen Tien Huy; Le Thi Bich Thoa; Nguyen Phuoc Long; Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang; Kenji Hirayama; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Investigating the Experiences of Childhood Cancer Patients and Parents Participating in Optional Nontherapeutic Clinical Research Studies in the UK.

Authors:  Julie Errington; Ghada Malik; Julie Evans; Jenny Baston; Annie Parry; Lisa Price; Hina Johnstone; Selena Peters; Victoria Oram; Karen Howe; Emma Whiteley; Jane Tunnacliffe; Gareth J Veal
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Developing and evaluating multimedia information resources to improve engagement of children, adolescents, and their parents with trials (TRECA study): Study protocol for a series of linked randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jacqueline Martin-Kerry; Peter Bower; Bridget Young; Jonathan Graffy; Rebecca Sheridan; Ian Watt; Paul Baines; Catherine Stones; Jennifer Preston; Steven Higgins; Carrol Gamble; Peter Knapp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Dominik Soll; Maria Magdalena Guraiib; Nigel Campbell Rollins; Andreas Alois Reis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Consent to research participation: understanding and motivation among German pupils.

Authors:  Jana Reetz; Gesine Richter; Christoph Borzikowsky; Christine Glinicke; Stephanie Darabaneanu; Alena Buyx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.

Authors:  Irma M Hein; Pieter W Troost; Robert Lindeboom; Martine C de Vries; C Michel Zwaan; Ramón J L Lindauer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.

Authors:  April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.