Literature DB >> 17960676

Multislice computed tomography for evaluating acetabular defects in revision THA.

Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo1, Mar Tapia, Carmen Martin-Hervas.   

Abstract

Acetabular bone defects influence acetabular revision surgery, but plain radiographs provide limited information about the osteolytic lesions. Multislice computed tomography may show the volume and location of osteolytic cavities in patients with failed cups more accurately than plain radiographs. We asked whether multislice computed tomography with metal artifact minimization could calculate the volume and location of pelvic osteolysis associated with a failed cup. We evaluated 60 hips with computed tomography just before cup revision. Resolution and bone contrast were maximized using the 135 kV and 250 mA scan settings. The computed tomography slice thickness was 3 mm and the reconstruction index was 1.5 mm. Bone defects were classified according to the radiographic criteria of Paprosky et al. Radiographs showed acetabular lysis on 33 hips, whereas computed tomography scans showed it on 52 hips. The most frequent locations of osteolysis were the posterior wall and ischium. Radiographs underestimated the extent of the lysis. In most hips, the amount of osteolysis seen on the computed tomography views was greater compared with the radiographs: the average volumetric bone was 37.9 cm3. Multislice computed tomography with metal artifact minimization is more sensitive than plain radiographs for identifying and quantifying osteolysis around the cup. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17960676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Voxel classification and graph cuts for automated segmentation of pathological periprosthetic hip anatomy.

Authors:  Daniel F Malan; Charl P Botha; Edward R Valstar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Periprosthetic osteolysis after total hip replacement: molecular pathology and clinical management.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Susan D Neale; David R Haynes; Oksana T Holubowycz; Margaret A McGee; Lucian B Solomon; Stuart A Callary; Gerald J Atkins; David M Findlay
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  Correlation of computed tomography with histology in the assessment of periprosthetic defect healing.

Authors:  Stephen D Cook; Laura P Patron; Samantha L Salkeld; Kirk E Smith; Bruce Whiting; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  CORR Insights®: Periprosthetic Occult Fractures of the Acetabulum Occur Frequently During Primary THA.

Authors:  Enrique Gomez-Barrena
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using the oval-shaped uncemented Trč-Cingr cup.

Authors:  Eduard Šťastný; Tomáš Trč; Milan Handl; Petr Kos; Jakub Kautzner; Theodoros Philippou; Jiří Lisý
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects.

Authors:  Alexander Meynen; Georges Vles; Mark Roussot; Anthony Van Eemeren; Hazem Wafa; Michiel Mulier; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort.

Authors:  O Bischel; J B Seeger; Jb Seeger; M Krüger; M Krüge; R G Bitsch; Bg Bitsch
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-16

10.  MRI does not detect acetabular osteolysis around metal-on-metal Birmingham THA.

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.