Literature DB >> 17957755

Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer for depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Mark T Hegel1, E Dale Collins, Stephen Kearing, Karen L Gillock, Caroline P Moore, Tim A Ahles.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Receiving a new diagnosis of breast cancer is a distressing experience that may precipitate an episode of major depressive disorder. Efficient screening methods for detecting depression in the oncology setting are needed. This study evaluated the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of the single-item Distress Thermometer (DT) for detecting depression in women newly diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer.
METHODS: We assessed 321 patients (of 345 consecutive patients) at the time of their pre-surgical consultation at a Comprehensive Breast Cancer Program. Patients were administered the DT along with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Depression Module (PHQ-9) as a gold standard diagnostic assessment of depression status.
RESULTS: Mean DT scores (11-point scale, 0-10) were significantly higher for depressed versus non-depressed patients (8.1 versus 4.4). In ROC analyses the DT showed strong discriminatory power relative to the PHQ-9-derived diagnosis of depression, with an area under the curve of 0.87. Patient age, education, marital status and stage of disease resulted in similar operating characteristics. A score of 7 represented the optimal trade-off between sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.85) characteristics for detecting depression.
CONCLUSIONS: The single-item DT performs satisfactorily relative to the PHQ-9 for detecting depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. A cutoff score of 7 on the DT possesses the optimal sensitivity and specificity characteristics. The strength of these findings suggests that a careful psychosocial evaluation should follow a positive screen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17957755      PMCID: PMC3806281          DOI: 10.1002/pon.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  24 in total

Review 1.  NCCN: Distress management.

Authors:  J C Holland; P B Jacobsen; M B Riba
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 2.  Stress, coping, and immune function in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linda J Luecken; Bruce E Compas
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2002

3.  Psychological impact of benign breast biopsy: a longitudinal, comparative study.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Janet S Carpenter; Jamie L Studts; Matthew J Cordova; Lauren L C Cunningham; Abbie Beacham; David Sloan; Daniel Kenady; Patrick McGrath
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN rapid-screening measure.

Authors:  Benson M Hoffman; Michael A Zevon; Mary C D'Arrigo; Tracy B Cecchini
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisco Gil; Luigi Grassi; Luzia Travado; Michele Tomamichel; Juan Ramón Gonzalez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; K Kroenke; M Linzer; F V deGruy; S R Hahn; D Brody; J G Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Treatment of symptom clusters: pain, depression, and fatigue.

Authors:  Stewart B Fleishman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

Review 9.  Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review.

Authors:  Maria Kangas; Jane L Henry; Richard A Bryant
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-05

10.  Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Lorna Kwan; Annette L Stanton; Janice L Krupnick; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Julienne E Bower; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  48 in total

1.  Metastatic breast cancer patients' expectations and priorities for symptom improvement.

Authors:  Danielle B Tometich; Catherine E Mosher; Adam T Hirsh; Kevin L Rand; Shelley A Johns; Marianne S Matthias; Samantha D Outcalt; Bryan P Schneider; Lida Mina; Anna Maria V Storniolo; Erin V Newton; Kathy D Miller
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Development and validation of self- and caregiver-report of a distress screening tool for pediatric cancer survivors.

Authors:  Soo Jin Yoon; Kyong-Mee Chung; Jung Woo Han; Seung Min Hahn; Sun Hee Kim; Chuhl Joo Lyu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Evaluation of Pillars4life: a virtual coping skills program for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sophia K Smith; Jonathan D O'Donnell; Amy P Abernethy; Kristin MacDermott; Tina Staley; Gregory P Samsa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment: A Novel Tool for Preoperative Evaluation of the Geriatric Oncology Patient.

Authors:  Armin Shahrokni; Amy Tin; Robert J Downey; Vivian Strong; Sanam Mahmoudzadeh; Manpreet K Boparai; Sincere McMillan; Andrew Vickers; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 5.  Quantifying psychological distress among cancer patients in interventions and scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Yeh; Yu-Chu Chung; Man-Ying F Hsu; Chin-Che Hsu
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-03

6.  The diagnostic role of a short screening tool--the distress thermometer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Jing Zhang; Wuning Zhong; Chi Shu; Fengtian Wang; Jianing Wen; Min Zhou; Yaxiong Sang; Yu Jiang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The effect of treatment on patient-reported distress after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Karine Yenokyan; Yi Ren; Benjamin A Goldstein; Ilona Stashko; Steve Power; Madeline J Thornton; P Kelly Marcom; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Geriatric Assessment, Not ASA Physical Status, Is Associated With 6-Month Postoperative Survival in Patients With Cancer Aged ≥75 Years.

Authors:  Armin Shahrokni; Bella Marie Vishnevsky; Brian Jang; Saman Sarraf; Koshy Alexander; Soo Jung Kim; Robert Downey; Anoushka Afonso; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  An analysis of the distress thermometer problem list and distress in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lisa VanHoose; Lora L Black; Kimberly Doty; Dory Sabata; Philip Twumasi-Ankrah; Sarah Taylor; Rhonda Johnson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Anna L Hawkes; Karen L Hughes; Sandy D Hutchison; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.