Literature DB >> 17957500

Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of dose distribution perturbation due to head heterogeneities for Linac and Gamma Knife stereotactic radiotherapy.

Kiki Theodorou1, Sotirios Stathakis, Bengt Lind, Constantin Kappas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In SRT/SRS, dedicated treatment planning systems are used for the calculation of the dose distribution. The majority of these systems utilize the standard TMR/OAR formalism for dose calculation as well as they usually neglect any perturbation due to head heterogeneities. The aim of this study is to examine the errors due to head heterogeneities for both absolute and relative dose distributions in stereotactic radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetric measurements in phantoms have been made for linac stereotactic irradiation. CT-based phantoms have been used for Monte Carlo simulations for both linac-based stereotactic system and Gamma Knife unit. Absolute and relative dose distributions have been compared between homogeneous and heterogeneous media. DVH and TCP results are presented for all cases.
RESULTS: The maximum absolute dose difference at the isocenter was 2.2% and 6.9% for the linac and Gamma Knife respectively. The impact of heterogeneity in the target DVH was minor for the linac technique whereas considerable difference was observed for the Gamma Knife treatment. This was reflected also to the radiobiological evaluation, where the maximum TCP difference for the linac system was 2.7% and for the Gamma Knife was 4%. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The errors rising from the existence of head heterogeneities are not negligible especially for the Gamma Knife which uses lower energy beams. The errors of the absolute dose calculation could be easily eliminated by implementing a simple heterogeneity correction algorithm at the TPS. Nevertheless, the errors for not taking into account the lateral electron transport would require a more sophisticated approach and even direct Monte Carlo calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17957500     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701697712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Characterisation of dose distribution in linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with the dynamic conformal arc technique: consideration of the optimal method for dose prescription and evaluation.

Authors:  K Ohtakara; S Hayashi; H Hoshi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS).

Authors:  Steven K Seung; David A Larson; James M Galvin; Minesh P Mehta; Louis Potters; Christopher J Schultz; Santosh V Yajnik; Alan C Hartford; Seth A Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery with CT image-based dose calculation.

Authors:  Andy Yuanguang Xu; Jagdish Bhatnagar; Greg Bednarz; Ajay Niranjan; Douglas Kondziolka; John Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  A preplanning method for stereotactic radiosurgery to improve treatment workflow.

Authors:  Kang-Hyun Ahn; Naim Ozturk; Brett Smith; Konstantin V Slavin; Matthew Koshy; Bulent Aydogan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Do we need a new CT scan for retreatment of intracranial SRS patients?

Authors:  David Wiant; Matthew Manning; Kyle Koch; Jacqueline Maurer; Lane Hayes; Han Liu; Qingyang Shang; Benjamin Sintay
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Current concepts in stereotactic radiosurgery - a neurosurgical and radiooncological point of view.

Authors:  Jan Vesper; B Bölke; C Wille; P A Gerber; C Matuschek; M Peiper; H J Steiger; W Budach; G Lammering
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  GammaKnife versus VMAT radiosurgery plan quality for many brain metastases.

Authors:  Peter S Potrebko; Andrew Keller; Sean All; Samir Sejpal; Julie Pepe; Kunal Saigal; Shravan Kandula; William F Sensakovic; Ravi Shridhar; Jan Poleszczuk; Matthew Biagioli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.