Literature DB >> 17955190

Correlation between glucose/fructose discrepancy and hexokinase kinetic properties in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains.

Nele J Berthels1, Ricardo R Cordero Otero, Florian F Bauer, Isak S Pretorius, Johan M Thevelein.   

Abstract

Grape juice contains about equal amounts of glucose and fructose, but wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ferment glucose slightly faster than fructose, leading to fructose concentrations that exceed glucose concentrations in the fermenting must. A high fructose/glucose ratio may contribute to sluggish and stuck fermentations, a major problem in the global wine industry. We evaluated wine yeast strains with different glucose and fructose consumption rates to show that a lower glucose preference correlates with a higher fructose/glucose phosphorylation ratio in cell extracts and a lower K (m) for both sugars. Hxk1 has a threefold higher V (max) with fructose than with glucose, whereas Hxk2 has only a slightly higher V (max) with glucose than with fructose. Overexpression of HXK1 in a laboratory strain of S. cerevisiae (W303-1A) accelerated fructose consumption more than glucose consumption, but overexpression in a wine yeast strain (VIN13) reduced fructose consumption less than glucose consumption. Results with laboratory strains expressing a single kinase showed that total hexokinase activity is inversely correlated with the glucose/fructose (G/F) discrepancy. The latter has been defined as the difference between the rate of glucose and fructose fermentation. We conclude that the G/F discrepancy in wine yeast strains correlates with the kinetic properties of hexokinase-mediated sugar phosphorylation. A higher fructose/glucose phosphorylation ratio and a lower K (m) might serve as markers in selection and breeding of wine yeast strains with a lower tendency for sluggish fructose fermentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955190     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1231-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

1.  A novel methodology independent of fermentation rate for assessment of the fructophilic character of wine yeast strains.

Authors:  T Liccioli; P J Chambers; V Jiranek
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae and metabolic activators: HXT3 gene expression and fructose/glucose discrepancy in sluggish fermentation conditions.

Authors:  Patricia Díaz-Hellín; Victoria Naranjo; Juan Úbeda; Ana Briones
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit.

Authors:  R Craig MaClean; Ayari Fuentes-Hernandez; Duncan Greig; Laurence D Hurst; Ivana Gudelj
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Effect of glucose concentration on the rate of fructose consumption in native strains isolated from the fermentation of Agave duranguensis.

Authors:  M Díaz-Campillo; N Urtíz; O Soto; E Barrio; M Rutiaga; J Páez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Application of a substrate inhibition model to estimate the effect of fructose concentration on the growth of diverse Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  F Noé Arroyo-López; Amparo Querol; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Genome sequence of the non-conventional wine yeast Hanseniaspora guilliermondii UTAD222 unveils relevant traits of this species and of the Hanseniaspora genus in the context of wine fermentation.

Authors:  Isabel Seixas; Catarina Barbosa; Arlete Mendes-Faia; Ulrich Güldener; Rogério Tenreiro; Ana Mendes-Ferreira; Nuno P Mira
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Directed evolution as an approach to increase fructose utilization in synthetic grape juice by wine yeast AWRI 796.

Authors:  Michelle E Walker; Tommaso L Watson; Christopher R L Large; Yan Berkovich; Tom A Lang; Maitreya J Dunham; Sean Formby; Vladimir Jiranek
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.923

8.  Mild Pretreatments to Increase Fructose Consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Yeast Strains.

Authors:  Hatice Aybuke Karaoglan; Filiz Ozcelik; Alida Musatti; Manuela Rollini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Evaluation of Indigenous Candida oleophila and Candida boidinii in Monoculture and Sequential Fermentations: Impact on Ethanol Reduction and Chemical Profile in Chilean Sauvignon Blanc Wines.

Authors:  Sergio Benavides; Wendy Franco; Consuelo Ceppi De Lecco; Angélica Durán; Alejandra Urtubia
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.