Literature DB >> 17954806

Use of a case manager to improve osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Sumit R Majumdar1, Lauren A Beaupre, Charles H Harley, David A Hanley, Douglas A Lier, Angela G Juby, Walter P Maksymowych, John G Cinats, Neil R Bell, Donald W Morrish.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who survive hip fracture are at high risk of recurrent fractures, but rates of osteoporosis treatment 1 year after sustaining a fracture are less than 10% to 20%. We have developed an osteoporosis case manager intervention. The case manager educated patients, arranged bone mineral density tests, provided prescriptions, and communicated with primary care physicians. The intervention was compared with usual care in a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: We recruited from all hospitals that participate in the Capital Health system (Alberta, Canada), including patients 50 years or older who had sustained a hip fracture and excluding those who were receiving osteoporosis treatment or who lived in a long-term care facility. Primary outcome was bisphosphonate therapy 6 months after fracture; secondary outcomes included bone mineral density testing, appropriate care (bone mineral density testing and treatment if bone mass was low), and intervention costs.
RESULTS: We screened 2219 patients and allocated 220, as follows: 110 to the intervention group and 110 to the control group. Median age was 74 years, 60% were women, and 37% reported having had previous fractures. Six months after hip fracture, 56 patients in the intervention group (51%) were receiving bisphosphonate therapy compared with 24 patients in the control group (22%) (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-8.9; P < .001). Bone mineral density tests were performed in 88 patients in the intervention group (80%) vs 32 patients in the control group (29%) (P < .001). Of the 120 patients who underwent bone mineral density testing, 25 (21%) had normal bone mass. Patients in the intervention group were more likely to receive appropriate care than were patients in the control group (67% vs 26%; P < .001). The average intervention cost was $50.00 per patient.
CONCLUSION: For a modest cost, a case manager was able to substantially increase rates of osteoporosis treatment in a vulnerable elderly population at high risk of future fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17954806     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  67 in total

1.  Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  A Shibli-Rahhal; M S Vaughan-Sarrazin; K Richardson; P Cram
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Appraising osteoporosis care gaps.

Authors:  Thomas P Olenginski; Jana L Antohe; Elaine Sunderlin; Thomas M Harrington
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Medical management in the acute hip fracture patient: a comprehensive review for the internist.

Authors:  Laura Bateman; Srinivas Vuppala; Patricia Porada; William Carter; Charitraheen Baijnath; Kabeer Burman; Ryan Lee; Jodie Hargus
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Underprescription of beneficial medicines in older people: causes, consequences and prevention.

Authors:  Antonio Cherubini; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Fracture Liaison Services in an open system: how was it done? what were the barriers and how were they overcome?

Authors:  Manju Chandran
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Accident or osteoporosis?: Survey of community follow-up after low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  Sonia Singh; Ramona Foster; Karim M Khan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore.

Authors:  M Chandran; M Z W Tan; M Cheen; S B Tan; M Leong; T C Lau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.