Literature DB >> 17954647

Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities.

Damian J M Tolan1, Euan M Armstrong, Anthony H Chapman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the significance of extracolonic abnormalities in patients older than 70 years referred for CT colonography (CTC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 400 consecutive patients older than 70 years undergoing CTC over a 14-month period. All patients presented with weight loss, alteration of bowel habits, rectal blood loss, abdominal pain, or anemia; these symptoms led to clinical suspicion of lower gastrointestinal abnormalities.
RESULTS: Five hundred five separate extracolonic abnormalities were detected in 268 of 400 patients (67%). One hundred thirty-nine pathologic processes were deemed significant in 116 patients. Of these, 110 lesions (79%) were previously unknown in 96 of the 400 patients (24.0%). Forty-nine of the 400 patients (12.3%) had at least one malignancy, including 23 extracolonic malignancies and 29 colorectal malignancies. Thirteen patients had early cancers (T1N0M0 or T2N0M0). Twenty of the colon cancer patients had significant previously unknown extracolonic abnormalities, half of which were related to the primary tumor and half of which were unrelated extracolonic abnormalities.
CONCLUSION: In patients older than 70 years being examined because of lower gastrointestinal symptoms, CTC findings yield a high number of new significant extracolonic abnormalities. This finding makes a compelling case for targeting this group of patients for a CTC service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17954647     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of CT colonography in symptomatic assessment, surveillance and screening.

Authors:  L Maximilian Almond; Douglas M Bowley; Sharad S Karandikar; Shuvro H Roy-Choudhury
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Guideline for referral of patients with suspected colorectal cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Emily T Vella; Amanda Hey; Marko Simunovic; William Harris; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Katrina Armstrong; Peter Groeneveld
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  CT Colonography to exclude colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Sarit Badiani; Silvia Tomas Hernandez; Sharad Karandikar; Shuvro Roy-Choudhury
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Samuel Smith; Steve Halligan; Alex Ghanouni; Emily Power; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Edward Dadswell; Wendy Atkin; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MRI enterography: what is the clinical impact of unsuspected extra-enteric findings?

Authors:  A Radhamma; S Halligan; S Bloom; S McCartney; S A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  The economic burden of incidentally detected findings.

Authors:  Alexander Ding; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: literature review and possible outcomes.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Carolyn M Rutter; Abraham H Dachman; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Is intravenous contrast necessary for detection of clinically significant extracolonic findings in patients undergoing CT colonography?

Authors:  T Y Yau; Laa Alkandari; B Haaland; W Low; C H Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.

Authors:  Jake Theis; David H Kim; Meghan G Lubner; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.