Literature DB >> 17952121

TCDD deregulates contact inhibition in rat liver oval cells via Ah receptor, JunD and cyclin A.

C Weiss1, D Faust, I Schreck, A Ruff, T Farwerck, A Melenberg, S Schneider, B Oesch-Bartlomowicz, J Zatloukalová, J Vondrácek, F Oesch, C Dietrich.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a transcription factor involved in physiological processes, but also mediates most, if not all, toxic responses to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Activation of the AhR by TCDD leads to its dimerization with aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (ARNT) and transcriptional activation of several phase I and II metabolizing enzymes. However, this classical signalling pathway so far failed to explain the pleiotropic hazardous effects of TCDD, such as developmental toxicity and tumour promotion. Thus, there is an urgent need to define genetic programmes orchestrated by AhR to unravel its role in physiology and toxicology. Here we show that TCDD treatment of rat liver oval cells leads to induction of the transcription factor JunD, resulting in transcriptional upregulation of the proto-oncogene cyclin A which finally triggers a release from contact inhibition. Ectopic expression of cyclin A in confluent cultures overcomes G(1) arrest, indicating that increased cyclin A levels are indeed sufficient to bypass contact inhibition. Functional interference with AhR-, but not with ARNT, abolished TCDD-induced increase in JunD and cyclin A and prevented loss of contact inhibition. In summary, we have discovered a novel AhR-dependent and probably ARNT-independent signalling pathway involving JunD and cyclin A, which mediates TCDD-induced deregulation of cell cycle control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952121     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  23 in total

Review 1.  Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of rat, mouse, pig, guinea pig, man, and in human skin models.

Authors:  F Oesch; E Fabian; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Rapid Analysis of Effects of Environmental Toxicants on Tumorigenesis and Inflammation Using a Transgenic Zebrafish Model for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Qiqi Yang; Lyana Salim; Chuan Yan; Zhiyuan Gong
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor functions as a tumor suppressor of liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Yunxia Fan; Gregory P Boivin; Erik S Knudsen; Daniel W Nebert; Ying Xia; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Mechanisms of environmental chemicals that enable the cancer hallmark of evasion of growth suppression.

Authors:  Rita Nahta; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Rafaela Andrade-Vieira; Sarah N Bay; Dustin G Brown; Gloria M Calaf; Robert C Castellino; Karine A Cohen-Solal; Annamaria Colacci; Nichola Cruickshanks; Paul Dent; Riccardo Di Fiore; Stefano Forte; Gary S Goldberg; Roslida A Hamid; Harini Krishnan; Dale W Laird; Ahmed Lasfar; Paola A Marignani; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Christian C Naus; Richard Ponce-Cusi; Jayadev Raju; Debasish Roy; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Renza Vento; Jan Vondráček; Mark Wade; Jordan Woodrick; William H Bisson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: focus on the cancer hallmark of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Zhiwei Hu; Samira A Brooks; Valérian Dormoy; Chia-Wen Hsu; Hsue-Yin Hsu; Liang-Tzung Lin; Thierry Massfelder; W Kimryn Rathmell; Menghang Xia; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Dustin G Brown; Kalan R Prudhomme; Annamaria Colacci; Roslida A Hamid; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Elizabeth P Ryan; Jordan Woodrick; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Rabindra Roy; Stefano Forte; Lorenzo Memeo; Hosni K Salem; Leroy Lowe; Lasse Jensen; William H Bisson; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation attenuates Per1 gene induction and influences circadian clock resetting.

Authors:  Can-Xin Xu; Chun Wang; Stacey L Krager; Kathleen M Bottum; Shelley A Tischkau
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Pure non-dioxin-like PCB congeners suppress induction of AhR-dependent endpoints in rat liver cells.

Authors:  Petra Brenerová; Timo Hamers; Jorke H Kamstra; Jan Vondráček; Simona Strapáčová; Patrik L Andersson; Miroslav Machala
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor cross-talks with multiple signal transduction pathways.

Authors:  Alvaro Puga; Ci Ma; Jennifer L Marlowe
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 9.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor has a normal function in the regulation of hematopoietic and other stem/progenitor cell populations.

Authors:  Kameshwar P Singh; Fanny L Casado; Lisa A Opanashuk; Thomas A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor binds to E2F1 and inhibits E2F1-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Marlowe; Yunxia Fan; Xiaoqing Chang; Li Peng; Erik S Knudsen; Ying Xia; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.