Literature DB >> 17950784

Nomogram for survival after primary surgery for bulky stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma.

Dennis S Chi1, Meena J Palayekar, Yukio Sonoda, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Christopher S Awtrey, Jae Huh, Eric L Eisenhauer, Richard R Barakat, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nomograms have been developed for numerous malignancies to predict a specific individual's probability of long-term survival based on known prognostic factors. To date, only one prediction model has been reported for patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). The objective of this study was to develop a more accurate survival nomogram for patients with bulky stage IIIC EOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nomogram predictor variables included age, tumor grade, histologic type, preoperative platelet count, ascites, and residual disease after primary cytoreduction. Disease-specific survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariate analysis, which was the basis for the nomogram. The concordance index was used as an accuracy measure with bootstrapping to correct for optimistic bias.
RESULTS: A total of 424 evaluable patients with bulky stage IIIC EOC underwent primary surgery at our institution during the study period of 1/89 to 12/03. All patients received postoperative platinum-based systemic chemotherapy. EOC-specific survival at 5 years was 51%. Using the six predictor variables, a nomogram was constructed and internally validated using bootstrapping. It was shown to have excellent calibration with a bootstrap corrected concordance index of 0.67, which was more accurate in predicting survival at this stage than the previously published model (concordance index=0.53).
CONCLUSION: Utilizing six readily accessible predictor variables, our nomogram more accurately predicted 5-year disease-specific survival for bulky stage IIIC EOC than the previously published model. This tool may be useful for patient counseling, determination of clinical trial eligibility, and postoperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950784     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Surgery confounds biology: the predictive value of stage-, grade- and prostate-specific antigen for recurrence after radical prostatectomy as a function of surgeon experience.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline J Savage; Fernando J Bianco; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan; Fernando P Secin; Bertrand D Guilloneau; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Development and validation of a risk-calculator for adverse perioperative outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Alexander Melamed; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A nomogram for predicting overall survival of women with endometrial cancer following primary therapy: toward improving individualized cancer care.

Authors:  N R Abu-Rustum; Q Zhou; J D Gomez; K M Alektiar; M L Hensley; R A Soslow; D A Levine; D S Chi; R R Barakat; A Iasonos
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The role of liver-directed surgery in patients with hepatic metastasis from a gynecologic primary carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah I Kamel; Mechteld C de Jong; Richard D Schulick; Teresa P Diaz-Montes; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Barish H Edil; Michael A Choti; Robert A Anders; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Chemotherapy and Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Guillaume Passot; Olivier Soubrane; Felice Giuliante; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Diane Goéré; Suguru Yamashita; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Incorporation of postoperative CT data into clinical models to predict 5-year overall and recurrence free survival after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Irene A Burger; Debra A Goldman; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Michael W Kattan; Changhon Yu; Lei Kou; Vaagn Andikyan; Dennis S Chi; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Risk-scoring model for prediction of non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Mariam M AlHilli; Christine W Tran; Carrie L Langstraat; Janice R Martin; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Andrea Mariani; William A Cliby; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Considerations in the surgical management of ovarian cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Carrie Langstraat; William A Cliby
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

9.  Nomogram prediction for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Authors:  S Polterauer; C Grimm; G Hofstetter; N Concin; C Natter; A Sturdza; R Pötter; C Marth; A Reinthaller; G Heinze
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  External validation of three prognostic models for overall survival in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R van de Laar; J IntHout; T Van Gorp; S Verdonschot; A M van Altena; C G Gerestein; L F A G Massuger; P L M Zusterzeel; R F P M Kruitwagen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.