Literature DB >> 17950509

Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.

Maartje De Goede1, Albert Postma.   

Abstract

Object-location memory is the only spatial task where female subjects have been shown to outperform males. This result is not consistent across all studies, and may be due to the combination of the multi-component structure of object location memory with the conditions under which different studies were done. Possible gender differences in object location memory and its component object identity memory were assessed in the present study. In order to disentangle these two components, an object location memory task (in which objects had to be relocated in daily environments), and a separate object identity recognition task were carried out. This study also focused on the conditions under which object locations were encoded and retrieved. Only half of the participants were aware of the fact that object locations had to be retrieved later on. Moreover, by applying the 'process dissociation procedure' to the object location memory assessments and the 'remember-know' paradigm to the object identity measure, the amount of explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) retrieval was estimated for each component. In general, females performed better than males on the object location memory task. However, when controlled for object identity memory, females no longer outperformed males, whereas they did not obtain a higher general object identity memory score, nor did they have more explicit or implicit recollection of the object identities. These complicated effects might stem from a difference between males and females, in the way locations or associations between objects and locations are retrieved. In general, participants had more explicit (conscious) recollection than implicit (unconscious) recollection. No effect of encoding context was found, nor any interaction effect of gender, encoding and retrieval context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950509     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  6 in total

1.  Altered source memory retrieval is associated with pathological doubt in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Christy A Olson; Lisa R Hale; Nancy Hamilton; Joshua N Powell; Laura E Martin; Cary R Savage
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

3.  Contributions of sex and genotype to exploratory behavior differences in an aged humanized APOE mouse model of late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  John W McLean; Avnish Bhattrai; Francesca Vitali; Adam C Raikes; Jean-Paul L Wiegand; Roberta Diaz Brinton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Digit ratio predicts sense of direction in women.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The processing of object identity information by women and men.

Authors:  Michael Tlauka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does an oblique/slanted perspective during virtual navigation engage both egocentric and allocentric brain strategies?

Authors:  Julien Barra; Laetitia Laou; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Denis Lebihan; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.