Literature DB >> 17950508

Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation.

Vikki Entwistle1, Maria Prior, Zoe C Skea, Jillian J Francis.   

Abstract

Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policy-makers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type 1 or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multi-practitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgmental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950508     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  What patient involvement means to new patients at two HIV clinics: A longitudinal, qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Freytag; Zhixin J Jiang; Thomas P Giordano; Robert A Westbrook; Sheryl A McCurdy; Sarah Njue-Marendes; Bich N Dang
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-03-25

3.  The Rhetoric of the 'Passive Patient' in Indian Medical Negligence Cases.

Authors:  Supriya Subramani
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-12-04

4.  Physician-related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Peter M Ellis; Timothy J Whelan; Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Peter Lovrics; Som D Mukherjee; Nicole Hodgson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Finding autonomy in birth.

Authors:  Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Little; Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa Harris
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-21

8.  Engaging communication experts in a Delphi process to identify patient behaviors that could enhance communication in medical encounters.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Lynda A Anderson; Bhuvana Sukumar; Danielle A Beauchesne; Terry Stein; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Women's perceptions of their involvement in treatment decision making for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Cathy Charles; Timothy J Whelan; Peter M Ellis; Amiram Gafni; Peter Lovrics
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vanita Bhavnani; Brian Fisher
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.