Literature DB >> 17949138

Revisiting the Frenkel-Ladd method to compute the free energy of solids: the Einstein molecule approach.

Carlos Vega1, Eva G Noya.   

Abstract

In this paper a new method to evaluate the free energy of solids is proposed. The method can be regarded as a variant of the method proposed by Frenkel and Ladd [J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3188 (1984)]. The main equations of the method can be derived in a simple way. The method can be easily implemented within a Monte Carlo program. We have applied the method to determine the free energy of hard spheres in the solid phase for several system sizes. The obtained free energies agree within the numerical uncertainty with those obtained by Polson et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5339 (2000)]. The fluid-solid equilibria has been determined for several system sizes and compared to the values published previously by Wilding and Bruce [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5138 (2000)] using the phase switch methodology. It is shown that both the free energies and the coexistence pressures present a strong size dependence and that the results obtained from free energy calculations agree with those obtained using the phase switch method, which constitutes a cross-check of both methodologies. From the results of this work we estimate the coexistence pressure of the fluid-solid transition of hard spheres in the thermodynamic limit to be p*=11.54(4), which is slightly lower than the classical value of Hoover and Ree (p*=11.70) [J. Chem. Phys. 49, 3609 (1968)]. Taking into account the strong size dependence of the free energy of the solid phase, we propose to introduce finite size corrections, which allow us to estimate approximately the free energy of the solid phase in the thermodynamic limit from the known value of the free energy of the solid phase with N molecules. We have also determined the free energy of a Lennard-Jones solid by using both the methodology of this work and the finite size correction. It is shown how a relatively good estimate of the free energy of the system in the thermodynamic limit is obtained even from the free energy of a relatively small system.

Year:  2007        PMID: 17949138     DOI: 10.1063/1.2790426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  9 in total

1.  An ultralow-density porous ice with the largest internal cavity identified in the water phase diagram.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Yingying Huang; Chongqin Zhu; Hui Li; Jijun Zhao; Lu Wang; Lars Ojamäe; Joseph S Francisco; Xiao Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Concurrent coupling of realistic and ideal models of liquids and solids in Hamiltonian adaptive resolution simulations.

Authors:  Maziar Heidari; Robinson Cortes-Huerto; Kurt Kremer; Raffaello Potestio
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Comparing Alchemical Free Energy Estimates to Experimental Values Based on the Ben-Naim Formula: How Much Agreement Can We Expect?

Authors:  T Ryan Rogers; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Using MD Simulations To Calculate How Solvents Modulate Solubility.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Shannon Cao; Kevin Hoang; Kayla L Young; Andrew S Paluch; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Formation of porous ice frameworks at room temperature.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Weiduo Zhu; Jian Jiang; Chongqin Zhu; Chang Liu; Ben Slater; Lars Ojamäe; Joseph S Francisco; Xiao Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effect of Water Content on Thermodynamic Properties of Compressed Hydrogen.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Rahbari; Julio C Garcia-Navarro; Mahinder Ramdin; Leo J P van den Broeke; Othonas A Moultos; David Dubbeldam; Thijs J H Vlugt
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Challenges in the use of atomistic simulations to predict solubilities of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; David L Mobley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-05-31

8.  Size-dependent thermodynamic structural selection in colloidal crystallization.

Authors:  Evan Pretti; Hasan Zerze; Minseok Song; Yajun Ding; Runfang Mao; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  A theory of entropic bonding.

Authors:  Thi Vo; Sharon C Glotzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 12.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.