Literature DB >> 17948869

Accounting for patient heterogeneity in phase II clinical trials.

J Kyle Wathen1, Peter F Thall, John D Cook, Elihu H Estey.   

Abstract

Phase II clinical trials typically are single-arm studies conducted to decide whether an experimental treatment is sufficiently promising, relative to standard treatment, to warrant further investigation. Many methods exist for conducting phase II trials under the assumption that patients are homogeneous. In the presence of patient heterogeneity, however, these designs are likely to draw incorrect conclusions. We propose a class of model-based Bayesian designs for single-arm phase II trials with a binary or time-to-event outcome and two or more prognostic subgroups. The designs' early stopping rules are subgroup specific and allow the possibility of terminating some subgroups while continuing others, thus providing superior results when compared with designs that ignore treatment-subgroup interactions. Because our formulation requires informative priors on standard treatment parameters and subgroup main effects, and non-informative priors on experimental treatment parameters and treatment-subgroup interactions, we provide an algorithm for computing prior hyperparameter values. A simulation study is presented and the method is illustrated by a chemotherapy trial in acute leukemia. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17948869      PMCID: PMC5708894          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Hierarchical Bayesian approaches to phase II trials in diseases with multiple subtypes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; J Kyle Wathen; B Nebiyou Bekele; Richard E Champlin; Laurence H Baker; Robert S Benjamin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The determinatio of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1961-04

3.  One- and two-stage designs for stratified phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Wendy B London; Myron N Chang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Monitoring event times in early phase clinical trials: some practical issues.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Leiko H Wooten; Nizar M Tannir
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Thomas M Braun; Zhiguo Li
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  T T Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Bayesian interim analysis of phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  D F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

10.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  13 in total

1.  Shortcomings in the clinical evaluation of new drugs: acute myeloid leukemia as paradigm.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Noel S Weiss; Richard A Larson; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Do commonly used clinical trial designs reflect clinical reality?

Authors:  Elihu Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Improved two-stage tests for stratified phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Myron N Chang; Jonathan J Shuster; Wei Hou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Integrating subgroups with mixed-type endpoints in early phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Carl Koschmann
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Phase II trial of vorinostat and gemtuzumab ozogamicin as induction and post-remission therapy in older adults with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Bruno C Medeiros; Bayard L Powell; Charles A Schiffer; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Treatment-subgroup interaction: an example from a published, phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Carolyn E Behrendt; Edmund A Gehan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Suyu Liu; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Outpatient bendamustine and idarubicin for upfront therapy of elderly acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome: a phase I/II study using an innovative statistical design.

Authors:  Jack M Lionberger; John M Pagel; Vicky K Sandhu; Hu Xie; Mazyar Shadman; Raya Mawad; Alexandra Boehm; Carol Dean; Kathleen Shannon-Dorcy; Bart L Scott; Hans Joachim Deeg; Pamela S Becker; Paul C Hendrie; Roland B Walter; Fabiana Ostronoff; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 10.  Bayesian designs to account for patient heterogeneity in phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; J Kyle Wathen
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.