Literature DB >> 12587104

Hierarchical Bayesian approaches to phase II trials in diseases with multiple subtypes.

Peter F Thall1, J Kyle Wathen, B Nebiyou Bekele, Richard E Champlin, Laurence H Baker, Robert S Benjamin.   

Abstract

We propose a methodology for conducting phase II clinical trials in settings where the disease is categorized into multiple subtypes. A hierarchical Bayesian model is assumed for treatment effects within the subtypes. The hierarchical model, which is tailored to each particular application, allows treatment effects to differ across subtypes while assuming a priori that the effects are exchangeable and correlated. Two applications are described. The first is a trial of imatinib for sarcoma in which treatment activity is characterized by a binary indicator of tumour response. The second is a phase II trial of a new preparative regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with haematologic malignancies, with treatment effect characterized by the mean time from transplant to disease progression or death. The applications illustrate how the hierarchical Bayesian model borrows strength across subtypes. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12587104     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  31 in total

1.  Bayesian hierarchical classification and information sharing for clinical trials with subgroups and binary outcomes.

Authors:  Nan Chen; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 2.  Statistical issues in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Designing clinical trials for brain tumors: the next generation.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Prior Effective Sample Size in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.728

5.  Improved two-stage tests for stratified phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Myron N Chang; Jonathan J Shuster; Wei Hou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Integrating subgroups with mixed-type endpoints in early phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Carl Koschmann
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  An efficient basket trial design.

Authors:  Kristen M Cunanan; Alexia Iasonos; Ronglai Shen; Colin B Begg; Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Key Design Elements, Types, Features, and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Chen Hu; James J Dignam
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

9.  Phase IA/II, multicentre, open-label study of the CD40 antagonistic monoclonal antibody lucatumumab in adult patients with advanced non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Michelle Fanale; Sarit Assouline; John Kuruvilla; Philippe Solal-Céligny; Dae S Heo; Gregor Verhoef; Paolo Corradini; Jeremy S Abramson; Fritz Offner; Andreas Engert; Martin J S Dyer; Daniel Carreon; Brett Ewald; Johan Baeck; Anas Younes; Arnold S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Safety and efficacy of oral panobinostat plus chemotherapy in patients aged 65 years or younger with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel J DeAngelo; Alison R Walker; Richard F Schlenk; Jorge Sierra; Bruno C Medeiros; Enrique M Ocio; Christoph Röllig; Stephen A Strickland; Felicitas Thol; Sue-Zette Valera; Kohinoor Dasgupta; Noah Berkowitz; Robert K Stuart
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.