BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer of men in the Western world. Despite the over-expression of tumor-associated antigens, like PSA or PSMA, immune activation is inefficient. The goal of this investigation was to assess in situ characteristics of prostate cancer-infiltrating lymphocytes and to determine their activation status and effector function. METHODS: We compared 17 carcinoma containing tissues, four benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues and eight healthy prostate tissues regarding lymphocyte subset composition, locoregional distribution, and functional status using immunohistological staining of cryopreserved tissues. For determination of lymphocyte subsets, serial sections were stained with CD3, CD4, and CD8 antibodies. Activation status and effector function were studied using CD69, interferon-gamma (IFN gamma), perforin, and CD3 zeta chain antibodies. T-cell-receptor repertoire (TCR) analysis was made to determine the complexity of infiltrating lymphocytes. RESULTS: CD3+, CD4+, and CD69+ T lymphocytes were prominent in tissues derived from patients with prostate carcinoma. CD8+ lymphocytes were significantly less than CD4+ lymphocytes. IFN gamma and perforin were downregulated on infiltrating lymphocytes compared to cells of healthy prostate tissue. Very few lymphocytes were detected within cancerous lesions whereas surrounding tissues showed extensive lymphocyte cluster formation. The TCR repertoire of infiltrating lymphocytes was broad and similar to that of healthy prostate tissue, giving no evidence for specific lymphocyte recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: In the prostate cancer microenvironment, CD4+ T lymphocytes dominated while CD8+ T cells were sparse. The lymphocytes exhibited signs of disturbed effector function. Consequently, the immune response against autologous tumor cells is likely to be inefficient in controlling tumor growth. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is the most common cancer of men in the Western world. Despite the over-expression of tumor-associated antigens, like PSA or PSMA, immune activation is inefficient. The goal of this investigation was to assess in situ characteristics of prostate cancer-infiltrating lymphocytes and to determine their activation status and effector function. METHODS: We compared 17 carcinoma containing tissues, four benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues and eight healthy prostate tissues regarding lymphocyte subset composition, locoregional distribution, and functional status using immunohistological staining of cryopreserved tissues. For determination of lymphocyte subsets, serial sections were stained with CD3, CD4, and CD8 antibodies. Activation status and effector function were studied using CD69, interferon-gamma (IFN gamma), perforin, and CD3 zeta chain antibodies. T-cell-receptor repertoire (TCR) analysis was made to determine the complexity of infiltrating lymphocytes. RESULTS: CD3+, CD4+, and CD69+ T lymphocytes were prominent in tissues derived from patients with prostate carcinoma. CD8+ lymphocytes were significantly less than CD4+ lymphocytes. IFN gamma and perforin were downregulated on infiltrating lymphocytes compared to cells of healthy prostate tissue. Very few lymphocytes were detected within cancerous lesions whereas surrounding tissues showed extensive lymphocyte cluster formation. The TCR repertoire of infiltrating lymphocytes was broad and similar to that of healthy prostate tissue, giving no evidence for specific lymphocyte recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: In the prostate cancer microenvironment, CD4+ T lymphocytes dominated while CD8+ T cells were sparse. The lymphocytes exhibited signs of disturbed effector function. Consequently, the immune response against autologous tumor cells is likely to be inefficient in controlling tumor growth. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox Journal: Adv Anat Pathol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Ainhoa-M Figel; Dorothee Brech; Petra U Prinz; Ulrike K Lettenmeyer; Judith Eckl; Adriana Turqueti-Neves; Josef Mysliwietz; David Anz; Nicole Rieth; Niklas Muenchmeier; Alexander Buchner; Stefan Porubsky; Sabine I Siegert; Stephan Segerer; Peter J Nelson; Elfriede Noessner Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Kenneth F May; James L Gulley; Charles G Drake; Glenn Dranoff; Philip W Kantoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 12.531