BACKGROUND: Treatment side effects after radical prostatectomy include urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. These functional declines, coupled with the bother associated with these dysfunctions, lead to a complicated pattern of change in quality-of-life and decreased self-efficacy. METHODS: In this study, 72 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 6-weeks prior were randomly assigned to usual health care control group or peer-to-peer support (dyadic support) group. The dyadic meetings were held once a week for 8 weeks. Measured pre- and post-test was general health-related quality-of-life (SF-36), prostate cancer-specific quality-of-life (UCLA Prostate Cancer Index), and self-efficacy (Stanford Inventory of Cancer Patient Adjustment). RESULTS: By 8 weeks, self-efficacy significantly improved for men in the experimental group, but not for men in the control group. A series of logistic regression analyses showed that the dyadic intervention significantly accounted for changes in physical role functioning, bowel function, mental health, and social function. Age, education, and self-efficacy had significant interaction effects and increased the effects of the dyadic intervention on several outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had a significant impact on how men react socially and emotionally to the side effects of radical prostatectomy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment side effects after radical prostatectomy include urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction. These functional declines, coupled with the bother associated with these dysfunctions, lead to a complicated pattern of change in quality-of-life and decreased self-efficacy. METHODS: In this study, 72 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 6-weeks prior were randomly assigned to usual health care control group or peer-to-peer support (dyadic support) group. The dyadic meetings were held once a week for 8 weeks. Measured pre- and post-test was general health-related quality-of-life (SF-36), prostate cancer-specific quality-of-life (UCLA Prostate Cancer Index), and self-efficacy (Stanford Inventory of CancerPatient Adjustment). RESULTS: By 8 weeks, self-efficacy significantly improved for men in the experimental group, but not for men in the control group. A series of logistic regression analyses showed that the dyadic intervention significantly accounted for changes in physical role functioning, bowel function, mental health, and social function. Age, education, and self-efficacy had significant interaction effects and increased the effects of the dyadic intervention on several outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention had a significant impact on how men react socially and emotionally to the side effects of radical prostatectomy.
Authors: Mette L K Schmidt; Peter Østergren; Prue Cormie; Anne-Mette Ragle; Jens Sønksen; Julie Midtgaard Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Charlene J Treanor; Olinda Santin; Gillian Prue; Helen Coleman; Chris R Cardwell; Peter O'Halloran; Michael Donnelly Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-17
Authors: Theresa Helen Mazzarello Moore; Anna Jyoti Louise King; Maggie Evans; Debbie Sharp; Raj Persad; Alyson Louise Huntley Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Mario Bernardo-Filho; Mauro Luis Barbosa Júnior; Danúbia da Cunha Sá-Caputo; Eliane de Oliveira Guedes de Aguiar; Rafaelle Pacheco Carvalho de Lima; Sebastião David Santos-Filho; Severo de Paoli; Giuseppe Antonio Presta; Milena de Oliveira Bravo Monteiro; Angela Tavares Journal: Int J Biomed Sci Date: 2014-06
Authors: Suzanne K Chambers; Melissa K Hyde; David P Smith; Suzanne Hughes; Susan Yuill; Sam Egger; Dianne L O'Connell; Kevin Stein; Mark Frydenberg; Gary Wittert; Jeff Dunn Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.894