Literature DB >> 17948071

Adaptive Allocation of Attention: Effects of Sex and Sociosexuality on Visual Attention to Attractive Opposite-Sex Faces.

Lesley A Duncan1, Justin H Park, Jason Faulkner, Mark Schaller, Steven L Neuberg, Douglas T Kenrick.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that, compared with sociosexually restricted individuals, those with an unrestricted approach to mating would selectively allocate visual attention to attractive opposite-sex others. We also tested for sex differences in this effect. Seventy-four participants completed the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory, and performed a computer-based task that assessed the speed with which they detected changes in attractive and unattractive male and female faces. Differences in reaction times served as indicators of selective attention. Results revealed a Sex X Sociosexuality interaction: Compared with sociosexually restricted men, unrestricted men selectively allocated attention to attractive opposite-sex others; no such effect emerged among women. This finding was specific to opposite-sex targets and did not occur in attention to same-sex others. These results contribute to a growing literature on the adaptive allocation of attention in social environments.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17948071      PMCID: PMC2034358          DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Hum Behav        ISSN: 1090-5138            Impact factor:   4.178


  16 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.

Authors:  A Ohman; A Flykt; F Esteves
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09

3.  The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Arne Ohman; Markus Junghöfer; Almut I Weike; Jessica Stockburger; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2004-06

4.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

5.  Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.

Authors:  Norman P Li; Douglas T Kenrick
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-03

6.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics.

Authors:  J A Simpson; S W Gangestad; P N Christensen; K Leck
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

8.  Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder.

Authors:  Jon K Maner; Douglas T Kenrick; D Vaughn Becker; Andrew W Delton; Brian Hofer; Christopher J Wilbur; Steven L Neuberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-12

9.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.

Authors:  Norman P Li; J Michael Bailey; Douglas T Kenrick; Joan A W Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

10.  Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model.

Authors:  D T Kenrick; E K Sadalla; G Groth; M R Trost
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1990-03
View more
  15 in total

1.  Older adults show less interference from task-irrelevant social categories: evidence from the garner paradigm.

Authors:  Pei Wang; Qin Zhang; Kai-Li Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  Goal-Driven Cognition and Functional Behavior: The Fundamental-Motives Framework.

Authors:  Douglas T Kenrick; Steven L Neuberg; Vladas Griskevicius; D Vaughn Becker; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02

Review 3.  Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations.

Authors:  Douglas T Kenrick; Vladas Griskevicius; Steven L Neuberg; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05

4.  A Study of Creating Face Photographs Set Including Different Levels of Attractiveness.

Authors:  Özlem Ertan-Kaya; Banu Cangöz
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Non-threatening other-race faces capture visual attention: evidence from a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Shahd Al-Janabi; Colin MacLeod; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparisons make faces more attractive: An ERP study.

Authors:  Shangfeng Han; Jie Hu; Jie Gao; Jiayu Fan; Xinyun Xu; Pengfei Xu; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Visual attention in mixed-gender groups.

Authors:  Mary Jean Amon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-12

8.  Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.

Authors:  Michael E Price; Nicholas Pound; James Dunn; Sian Hopkins; Jinsheng Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differences according to Sex in Sociosexuality and Infidelity after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jhon Alexander Moreno; Michelle McKerral
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Assessing facial attractiveness: individual decisions and evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Ferenc Kocsor; Adam Feldmann; Tamas Bereczkei; János Kállai
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2013-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.