Literature DB >> 17943537

Progestins and breast cancer.

Jorge R Pasqualini1.   

Abstract

Progestins exert their progestational activity by binding to the progesterone receptor (form A, the most active and form B, the less active) and may also interact with other steroid receptors (androgen, glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, estrogen). They can have important effects in other tissues besides the endometrium, including the breast, liver, bone and brain. The biological responses of progestins cover a very large domain: lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, water and electrolyte regulation, hemostasis, fibrinolysis, and cardiovascular and immunological systems. At present, more than 200 progestin compounds have been synthesized, but the biological response could be different from one to another depending on their structure, metabolism, receptor affinity, experimental conditions, target tissue or cell line, as well as the biological response considered. There is substantial evidence that mammary cancer tissue contains all the enzymes responsible for the local biosynthesis of estradiol (E(2)) from circulating precursors. Two principal pathways are implicated in the final steps of E(2) formation in breast cancer tissue: the 'aromatase pathway', which transforms androgens into estrogens, and the 'sulfatase pathway', which converts estrone sulfate (E(1)S) into estrone (E(1)) via estrone sulfatase. The final step is the conversion of weak E(1) to the potent biologically active E(2) via reductive 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity. It is also well established that steroid sulfotransferases, which convert estrogens into their sulfates, are present in breast cancer tissues. It has been demonstrated that various progestins (e.g. nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone) as well as tibolone and their metabolites can block the enzymes involved in E(2) bioformation (sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) in breast cancer cells. These substances can also stimulate the sulfotransferase activity which converts estrogens into the biologically inactive sulfates. The action of progestins in breast cancer is very controversial; some studies indicate an increase in breast cancer incidence, others show no difference and still others a significant decrease. Progestin action can also be a function of combination with other molecules (e.g. estrogens). In order to clarify and better understand the response of progestins in breast cancer (incidence, mortality), as well as in hormone replacement therapy or endocrine dysfunction, new clinical trials are needed studying other progestins as a function of the dose and period of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943537     DOI: 10.1080/09513590701585003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nomegestrol acetate: pharmacology, safety profile and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Stefano Lello
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Postmenopausal levels of endogenous sex hormones and risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess V Clendenen; Karen L Koenig; Roy E Shore; Mortimer Levitz; Alan A Arslan; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Progestin and breast cancer risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marsha Samson; Nancy Porter; Olubunmi Orekoya; James R Hebert; Swann Arp Adams; Charles L Bennett; Susan E Steck
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Integrity of the LXXLL motif in Stat6 is required for the inhibition of breast cancer cell growth and enhancement of differentiation in the context of progesterone.

Authors:  Min Wei; Qi He; Zhongyin Yang; Zhiwei Wang; Qing Zhang; Bingya Liu; Qinlong Gu; Liping Su; Yingyan Yu; Zhenggang Zhu; Guofeng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Oral contraceptive use and mortality after 36 years of follow-up in the Nurses' Health Study: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brittany M Charlton; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Graham A Colditz; Stacey A Missmer; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Frank E Speizer; Karin B Michels
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-10-31

Review 6.  Review of the literature on combined oral contraceptives and cancer.

Authors:  Mustafa Kamani; Utku Akgor; Murat Gültekin
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Potential for the embryonic morphogen Nodal as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Strizzi; Katharine M Hardy; Naira V Margaryan; David W Hillman; Elisabeth A Seftor; Beiyun Chen; Xochiquetzal J Geiger; E Aubrey Thompson; Wilma L Lingle; Cathy A Andorfer; Edith A Perez; Mary J C Hendrix
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Oral contraceptive use by formulation and endometrial cancer risk among women born in 1947-1964: The Nurses' Health Study II, a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Norah A Burchardt; Amy L Shafrir; Rudolf Kaaks; Shelley S Tworoger; Renée T Fortner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.