Literature DB >> 17942376

Uracil incorporation into genomic DNA does not predict toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic inhibition of thymidylate synthase.

Yuhong Luo1, Mike Walla, Michael D Wyatt.   

Abstract

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target of several chemotherapeutic agents, including 5-FU and raltitrexed (Tomudex). During TS inhibition, TTP levels decrease with a subsequent increase in dUTP. Uracil incorporated into the genome is removed by base excision repair (BER). Thus, BER initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activity has been hypothesized to influence the toxicity induced by TS inhibitors. In this study we created a human cell line expressing the Ugi protein inhibitor of UNG family of UDGs, which reduces cellular UDG activity by at least 45-fold. Genomic uracil incorporation was directly measured by mass spectrometry following treatment with TS inhibitors. Genomic uracil levels were increased over 4-fold following TS inhibition in the Ugi-expressing cells, but did not detectably increase in UNG proficient cells. Despite the difference in genomic uracil levels, there was no difference in toxicity between the UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells to folate or nucleotide-based inhibitors of TS. Cell cycle analysis showed that UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells arrested in early S-phase and resumed replication progression during recovery from RTX treatment almost identically. The induction of gamma-H2AX was measured following TS inhibition as a measure of whether uracil excision promoted DNA double strand break formation during S-phase arrest. Although gamma-H2AX was detectable following TS inhibition, there was no difference between UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells. We therefore conclude that uracil excision initiated by UNG does not adequately explain the toxicity caused by TS inhibition in this model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17942376      PMCID: PMC2258137          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  37 in total

1.  Separating substrate recognition from base hydrolysis in human thymine DNA glycosylase by mutational analysis.

Authors:  U Hardeland; M Bentele; J Jiricny; P Schär
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Biphasic kinetics of the human DNA repair protein MED1 (MBD4), a mismatch-specific DNA N-glycosylase.

Authors:  F Petronzelli; A Riccio; G D Markham; S H Seeholzer; J Stoerker; M Genuardi; A T Yeung; Y Matsumoto; A Bellacosa
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Uracil in DNA--occurrence, consequences and repair.

Authors:  Hans E Krokan; Finn Drabløs; Geir Slupphaug
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG)-deficient mice reveal a primary role of the enzyme during DNA replication.

Authors:  H Nilsen; I Rosewell; P Robins; C F Skjelbred; S Andersen; G Slupphaug; G Daly; H E Krokan; T Lindahl; D E Barnes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress.

Authors:  I M Ward; J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Human MRE11 is inactivated in mismatch repair-deficient cancers.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giannini; Elisabetta Ristori; Fabio Cerignoli; Christian Rinaldi; Massimo Zani; Alessandra Viel; Laura Ottini; Marco Crescenzi; Stefano Martinotti; Margherita Bignami; Luigi Frati; Isabella Screpanti; Alberto Gulino
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  dUTPase and uracil-DNA glycosylase are central modulators of antifolate toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Beverly A Tinkelenberg; Michael J Hansbury; Robert D Ladner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies.

Authors:  Daniel B Longley; D Paul Harkin; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Expression of uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) does not affect cellular sensitivity to thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition.

Authors:  S J Welsh; S Hobbs; G W Aherne
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  The ability to accumulate deoxyuridine triphosphate and cellular response to thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition.

Authors:  S D Webley; S J Welsh; A L Jackman; G W Aherne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-08-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

1.  Detection of uracil within DNA using a sensitive labeling method for in vitro and cellular applications.

Authors:  Gergely Róna; Ildikó Scheer; Kinga Nagy; Hajnalka L Pálinkás; Gergely Tihanyi; Máté Borsos; Angéla Békési; Beáta G Vértessy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Uracil in DNA: consequences for carcinogenesis and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sondra H Berger; Douglas L Pittman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Effect of the thymidylate synthase inhibitors on dUTP and TTP pool levels and the activities of DNA repair glycosylases on uracil and 5-fluorouracil in DNA.

Authors:  Breeana C Grogan; Jared B Parker; Amy F Guminski; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK-3)-mediated Phosphorylation of Uracil N-Glycosylase 2 (UNG2) Facilitates the Repair of Floxuridine-induced DNA Lesions and Promotes Cell Survival.

Authors:  Carly A Baehr; Catherine J Huntoon; Song-My Hoang; Calvin R Jerde; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea enhances the inhibitory effect of resveratrol on 5-fluorouracil sensitive/resistant colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Dipon Das; Ranjan Preet; Purusottam Mohapatra; Shakti Ranjan Satapathy; Chanakya Nath Kundu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  SMUG1 but not UNG DNA glycosylase contributes to the cellular response to recovery from 5-fluorouracil induced replication stress.

Authors:  Pratik Nagaria; David Svilar; Ashley R Brown; Xiao-Hong Wang; Robert W Sobol; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Genome-wide alterations of uracil distribution patterns in human DNA upon chemotherapeutic treatments.

Authors:  Hajnalka L Pálinkás; Angéla Békési; Gergely Róna; Lőrinc Pongor; Gábor Papp; Gergely Tihanyi; Eszter Holub; Ádám Póti; Carolina Gemma; Simak Ali; Michael J Morten; Eli Rothenberg; Michele Pagano; Dávid Szűts; Balázs Győrffy; Beáta G Vértessy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  A one-step method for quantitative determination of uracil in DNA by real-time PCR.

Authors:  András Horváth; Beáta G Vértessy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase expression determines human lung cancer cell sensitivity to pemetrexed.

Authors:  Lachelle D Weeks; Pingfu Fu; Stanton L Gerson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  Induction of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in human cells by raltitrexed, an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase.

Authors:  Barbara Criscuolo Waldman; Yibin Wang; Kasturi Kilaru; Zhengguan Yang; Alaukik Bhasin; Michael D Wyatt; Alan S Waldman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.