Literature DB >> 17941789

Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort.

Ben H Chew1, Bodo E Knudsen, Linda Nott, Stephen E Pautler, Hassan Razvi, Justin Amann, John D Denstedt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ureteral stents may cause significant morbidity, including pain, dysuria, hematuria, and infection. New biomaterials, coatings, and designs have been studied in an attempt to reduce stent-related symptoms, but to date, the ideal comfortable stent has not been developed. In order to facilitate development of a stent that will mold and change with patient movement, we examined stent and ureteral movement with changes in patient body position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four women and two men with a median age of 60.5 +/- 7.7 years who underwent shockwave lithotripsy and insertion of a ureteral stent were enrolled. Static radiographs were performed with the patients in four positions: supine, standing, sitting, and bending forward. Differences in stent position were analyzed digitally relative to fixed bony reference points to determine ureteral movement.
RESULTS: The renal stent curl was most cephalad when the patient was supine and moved caudally an average of 2.5 +/- 1.5 cm when the patient stood up. The absolute vertical length of the stent was greatest when the patient was supine (31.1 +/- 1.2 cm) and shortened with standing (28.3 +/- 2.3 cm) and sitting (26.6 +/- 1.5 cm). The bladder curl moved an average of 2.3 +/- 1.2 cm vertically with patient movement.
CONCLUSIONS: By measuring stent position, we were able to quantify the range of motion of the ureter during changes in body position. Stent movement appears to be a combination of bowing in the proximal ureter and moving within the bladder. Future stent designs may take this into account to decrease stent-related symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17941789     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ureteral stent-associated complications--where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Samir Bidnur; Nathan Hoag; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent.

Authors:  Alexandre A Barros; Carlos Oliveira; Ana J Ribeiro; Riccardo Autorino; Rui L Reis; Ana Rita C Duarte; Estevão Lima
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent.

Authors:  Manuel Ritter; Patrick Krombach; Thomas Knoll; Maurice Stephan Michel; Axel Haecker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-18

Review 4.  Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective.

Authors:  Ben H Chew; Dirk Lange
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Ureteral Stent Discomfort and Its Management.

Authors:  Katherine M Fischer; Michael Louie; Phillip Mucksavage
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  In vitro simulation of stent fracture mechanisms in ureteric nitinol wire stents.

Authors:  Tine Hajdinjak; Mayur Patel; Athanasios Papatsoris; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz; Malcolm Birch
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-08-28

7.  Insertion of a single double-J stent for bilateral open ureteral reimplantation: introducing a novel technique and assessment of feasibility.

Authors:  Behnam Nabavizadeh; Sorena Keihani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Is intravesical stent position a predictor of associated morbidity?

Authors:  Dominik Abt; Livio Mordasini; Elisabeth Warzinek; Hans-Peter Schmid; Sarah Roberta Haile; Daniel Stephan Engeler; Gautier Müllhaupt
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-04-24

9.  Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management.

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

10.  Randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin, solifenacin, and combination of both in treatment of double-j stent-related lower urinary symptoms.

Authors:  Essam Shalaby; Abul-Fotouh Ahmed; Aref Maarouf; Iman Yahia; Mohamed Ali; Ammar Ghobish
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.