N Hill1, A Lenglet, A M Arnéz, I Carneiro. 1. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT. nigel.hill@lshtm.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness in reducing malaria of combining an insect repellent with insecticide treated bed nets compared with the nets alone in an area where vector mosquitoes feed in the early evening. DESIGN: A double blind, placebo controlled cluster-randomised clinical study. SETTING:Rural villages and peri-urban districts in the Bolivian Amazon. PARTICIPANTS: 4008 individuals in 860 households. INTERVENTIONS: All individuals slept under treated nets; one group also used a plant based insect repellent each evening, a second group used placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Episodes of Plasmodium falciparum or P vivax malaria confirmed by rapid diagnostic test or blood slide, respectively. RESULTS: We analysed 15,174 person months at risk and found a highly significant 80% reduction in episodes of P vivax in the group that used treated nets and repellent (incidence rate ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.38, P<0.001). Numbers of P falciparum cases during the study were small and, after adjustment for age, an 82% protective effect was observed, although this was not significant (0.18, 0.02 to 1.40, P=0.10). Reported episodes of fever with any cause were reduced by 58% in the group that used repellent (0.42, 0.31 to 0.56, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Insect repellents can provide protection against malaria. In areas where vectors feed in the early evening, effectiveness of treated nets can be significantly increased by using repellent between dusk and bedtime. This has important implications in malaria vector control programmes outside Africa and shows that the combined use of treated nets and insect repellents, as advocated for most tourists travelling to high risk areas, is fully justified. REGISTRATION: NCT 00144716.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness in reducing malaria of combining an insect repellent with insecticide treated bed nets compared with the nets alone in an area where vector mosquitoes feed in the early evening. DESIGN: A double blind, placebo controlled cluster-randomised clinical study. SETTING: Rural villages and peri-urban districts in the Bolivian Amazon. PARTICIPANTS: 4008 individuals in 860 households. INTERVENTIONS: All individuals slept under treated nets; one group also used a plant based insect repellent each evening, a second group used placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Episodes of Plasmodium falciparum or P vivax malaria confirmed by rapid diagnostic test or blood slide, respectively. RESULTS: We analysed 15,174 person months at risk and found a highly significant 80% reduction in episodes of P vivax in the group that used treated nets and repellent (incidence rate ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.38, P<0.001). Numbers of P falciparum cases during the study were small and, after adjustment for age, an 82% protective effect was observed, although this was not significant (0.18, 0.02 to 1.40, P=0.10). Reported episodes of fever with any cause were reduced by 58% in the group that used repellent (0.42, 0.31 to 0.56, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Insect repellents can provide protection against malaria. In areas where vectors feed in the early evening, effectiveness of treated nets can be significantly increased by using repellent between dusk and bedtime. This has important implications in malaria vector control programmes outside Africa and shows that the combined use of treated nets and insect repellents, as advocated for most tourists travelling to high risk areas, is fully justified. REGISTRATION: NCT 00144716.
Authors: Mark Rowland; Gerald Downey; Abdur Rab; Tim Freeman; Nasir Mohammad; Hamid Rehman; Naeem Durrani; Hugh Reyburn; Chris Curtis; Jo Lines; Mohammad Fayaz Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: James G Logan; Nina M Stanczyk; Ahmed Hassanali; Joshua Kemei; Antônio E G Santana; Karlos A L Ribeiro; John A Pickett; A Jennifer Mordue Luntz Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Mônica da Silva-Nunes; Marta Moreno; Jan E Conn; Dionicia Gamboa; Shira Abeles; Joseph M Vinetz; Marcelo U Ferreira Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: Marcie Tomblyn; Tom Chiller; Hermann Einsele; Ronald Gress; Kent Sepkowitz; Jan Storek; John R Wingard; Jo-Anne H Young; Michael J Boeckh; Michael A Boeckh Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Din Syafruddin; Michael J Bangs; Dian Sidik; Iqbal Elyazar; Puji B S Asih; Krisin Chan; Siti Nurleila; Christian Nixon; Joko Hendarto; Isra Wahid; Hasanuddin Ishak; Claus Bøgh; John P Grieco; Nicole L Achee; J Kevin Baird Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Samuel Dadzie; Daniel Boakye; Victor Asoala; Kwadwo Koram; Anthony Kiszewski; Maxwell Appawu Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Mauricio Rodríguez; Ligia Pérez; Juan Carlos Caicedo; Guillermo Prieto; José Antonio Arroyo; Harparkash Kaur; Martha Suárez-Mutis; Fernando de La Hoz; Jo Lines; Neal Alexander Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.278