Literature DB >> 17939478

Hip arthroscopy: outcome and patient satisfaction after 5 to 10 years.

Jürgen Londers1, Jan Van Melkebeek.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated outcome, complications, reoperations and global patient satisfaction 5 to 10 years after an arthroscopy of the central compartment of the hip joint in 56 consecutive patients. All patients suffered from unsolved hip pain for at least 6 months, had a positive Flexion-Adduction-Internal rotation test (FADIR-test) and a normal radiograph. The mean follow-up was 72 months (range: 60 to 120 months). Thirty-seven patients were male and 19 female, with a mean age of 34 years (range, 17 to 59 years). Forty-five were improved (6 only temporarily) and 11 had no improvement (7 underwent total hip arthroplasty). Outcome and patient satisfaction differ significantly and are primarily determined by the grade of cartilage damage. Patient satisfaction 5 to 10 years after an arthroscopy of the central compartment of the hip is high: 80% (n = 45) of the patients would undergo the same procedure again.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17939478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  9 in total

1.  What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy?

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Bryan T Jarrett; Olumide Ojeifo; Jo Ann Lee; Charles R Bragdon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Complications in hip arthroscopy and follow-up therapy. Analysis over a 5-year time period with a total of 13,000 cases].

Authors:  G Möckel; K Labs
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kowalczuk; M Bhandari; F Farrokhyar; I Wong; M Chahal; S Neely; R Gandhi; O R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Preoperative risk factors in hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; David Barastegui; Carlos López-de-Celis; Ferran Montaña; Xavier Cuscó; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Gonzalo Samitier-Solis; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  What Is the Association Between Articular Cartilage Damage and Subsequent THA 20 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears?

Authors:  Maureen K Dwyer; Catharine Tumpowsky; Andrew Boone; JoAnn Lee; Joseph C McCarthy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is associated with significant improvement in early patient reported outcomes: analysis of 4963 cases from the UK non-arthroplasty registry (NAHR) dataset.

Authors:  Richard Holleyman; Mark Andrew Sohatee; Stephen Lyman; Ajay Malviya; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 7.  Reporting of non-hip score outcomes following femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yan Sim; Nolan S Horner; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Jon Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 8.  Prognostic Factors for Conversion to Arthroplasty after Hip Arthroscopy. Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; David Barastegui; Ferran Montaña; Marta Rius; Xavier Cuscó; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-30

9.  HIP ARTHROSCOPY IN ATHLETES.

Authors:  Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello; Nelson Keiske Ono; Davi Gabriel Bellan; Emerson Kiyoshi Honda; Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Walter Riccioli Junior; Guilherme Do Val Sella
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.