UNLABELLED: Loss of bone mineral density occurs after discontinuation of teriparatide, if no subsequent treatment is given. Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at lumbar spine and further increased bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck, whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment. INTRODUCTION: We compared the sequential effects of raloxifene treatment with a placebo on teriparatide-induced increases in bone mineral density (BMD). A year of open-label raloxifene extended the study to assess the response with and without delay after discontinuation of teriparatide. METHODS: Following a year of open-label teriparatide 20 mug/day treatment, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 157) or a placebo (n = 172) for year 2, followed by a year of open-label raloxifene. BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The raloxifene and placebo groups showed a decrease in lumbar spine (LS) BMD in year 2 for raloxifene and placebo groups (-1.0 +/- 0.3%, P = 0.004; and -4.0 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.001, respectively); the decrease was less with raloxifene (P < 0.001). Open-label raloxifene treatment reversed the LS BMD decrease with a placebo, resulting in similar decreases 2 years after randomization (-2.6 +/- 0.4% (raloxifene-raloxifene) and -2.7 +/- 0.4% (placebo-placebo). At study end, LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD were higher than pre-teriparatide levels, with no significant differences between the raloxifene-raloxifene and placebo-raloxifene groups, respectively (LS: 6.1 +/- 0.5% vs. 5.1 +/- 0.5%; FN: 3.4 +/- 0.6% vs. 3.0 +/- 0.5%). CONCLUSION:Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at the LS and increased FN BMD whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Loss of bone mineral density occurs after discontinuation of teriparatide, if no subsequent treatment is given. Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at lumbar spine and further increased bone mineral density (BMD) at femoral neck, whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment. INTRODUCTION: We compared the sequential effects of raloxifene treatment with a placebo on teriparatide-induced increases in bone mineral density (BMD). A year of open-label raloxifene extended the study to assess the response with and without delay after discontinuation of teriparatide. METHODS: Following a year of open-label teriparatide 20 mug/day treatment, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 157) or a placebo (n = 172) for year 2, followed by a year of open-label raloxifene. BMD was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The raloxifene and placebo groups showed a decrease in lumbar spine (LS) BMD in year 2 for raloxifene and placebo groups (-1.0 +/- 0.3%, P = 0.004; and -4.0 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.001, respectively); the decrease was less with raloxifene (P < 0.001). Open-label raloxifene treatment reversed the LS BMD decrease with a placebo, resulting in similar decreases 2 years after randomization (-2.6 +/- 0.4% (raloxifene-raloxifene) and -2.7 +/- 0.4% (placebo-placebo). At study end, LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD were higher than pre-teriparatide levels, with no significant differences between the raloxifene-raloxifene and placebo-raloxifene groups, respectively (LS: 6.1 +/- 0.5% vs. 5.1 +/- 0.5%; FN: 3.4 +/- 0.6% vs. 3.0 +/- 0.5%). CONCLUSION: Sequential raloxifene prevented rapid bone loss at the LS and increased FN BMD whether raloxifene was started immediately or after a one-year delay following teriparatide treatment.
Authors: Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Lori Mosca; Peter Collins; Mary Jane Geiger; Deborah Grady; Marcel Kornitzer; Michelle A McNabb; Nanette K Wenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Somnath Sarkar; Bruce H Mitlak; Mayme Wong; John L Stock; Dennis M Black; Kristine D Harper Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Silvana Martino; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Trevor J Powles; John Mershon; Damon Disch; Roberta J Secrest; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert Lindsay; Wim H Scheele; Robert Neer; Gerhardt Pohl; Silvano Adami; Carlos Mautalen; Jean-Yves Reginster; Jan J Stepan; Stephen L Myers; Bruce H Mitlak Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004-10-11
Authors: Etah S Kurland; Samantha L Heller; Beverly Diamond; Donald J McMahon; Felicia Cosman; John P Bilezikian Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres Journal: Endocrine Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 3.633