Literature DB >> 17938952

From the genome to the proteome--biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Jens K Habermann1, Franz G Bader, Christian Franke, Kaja Zimmermann, Timo Gemoll, Britta Fritzsche, Thomas Ried, Gert Auer, Hans-Peter Bruch, Uwe J Roblick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Current clinical practice in colorectal cancer screening (fecal occult blood test, FOBT; colonoscopy) has contributed to a reduction of mortality. However, despite these screening programs, about 70% of carcinomas are detected at advanced tumor stages (UICC III/IV) presenting poor patient prognosis. Thus, innovative tools and methodologies for early cancer detection can directly result in improving patient survival rates. PATIENTS/
METHODS: Biomedical research has advanced rapidly in recent years with the availability of technologies such as global gene and protein expression profiling. Comprehensive tumor profiling has become a field of intensive research aiming at identifying biomarkers relevant for improved diagnostics and therapeutics.
RESULTS: In this paper, we report a comprehensive review of genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approaches for biomarker identification in tissue and blood with a main emphasis on two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry analyses.
CONCLUSION: Proteomics-based technologies enable to distinguish the healthy patient from the tumor patient with high sensitivity and specificity and could greatly improve common classification systems and diagnostics. However, this progress has not yet been transferred from bench to bedside but could open the door to a more accurate and target specific personalized medicine with improved patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938952     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-007-0230-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  80 in total

Review 1.  Stool screening for colorectal cancer: evolution from occult blood to molecular markers.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; Anthony P Shuber
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Prognostic value of p53 genetic changes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  U Kressner; M Inganäs; S Byding; I Blikstad; L Påhlman; B Glimelius; G Lindmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Detecting colorectal cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets.

Authors:  S M Dong; G Traverso; C Johnson; L Geng; R Favis; K Boynton; K Hibi; S N Goodman; M D'Allessio; P Paty; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; F Barany; B Levin; A Shuber; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; J Jen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Increased serum levels of complement C3a anaphylatoxin indicate the presence of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Uwe J Roblick; Brian T Luke; Darue A Prieto; William J J Finlay; Vladimir N Podust; John M Roman; Elisabeth Oevermann; Thomas Schiedeck; Nils Homann; Michael Duchrow; Thomas P Conrads; Timothy D Veenstra; Stanley K Burt; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Very alkaline immobilized pH gradients for two-dimensional electrophoresis of ribosomal and nuclear proteins.

Authors:  A Görg; C Obermaier; G Boguth; A Csordas; J J Diaz; J J Madjar
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a specific pattern of chromosomal gains and losses during the genesis of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  T Ried; R Knutzen; R Steinbeck; H Blegen; E Schröck; K Heselmeyer; S du Manoir; G Auer
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Expression profiling by microarrays in colorectal cancer (Review).

Authors:  Warren Shih; Runjan Chetty; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer.

Authors:  Jinong Li; Zhen Zhang; Jason Rosenzweig; Young Y Wang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells.

Authors:  Madhvi B Upender; Jens K Habermann; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn; J Carl Barrett; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Tumor ploidy as a risk factor for disease recurrence and short survival in surgically-treated Dukes' B2 colon cancer patients.

Authors:  D Nori; O Merimsky; E Samala; D Saw; E Cortes; E Chen; J W Turner
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  12 in total

1.  The focus of Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin Schneider; Jürgen Weitz; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Simultaneous amperometric immunosensing of the metastasis-related biomarkers IL-13Rα2 and CDH-17 by using grafted screen-printed electrodes and a composite prepared from quantum dots and carbon nanotubes for signal amplification.

Authors:  Verónica Serafín; Alejandro Valverde; María Garranzo-Asensio; Rodrigo Barderas; Susana Campuzano; Paloma Yáñez-Sedeño; José M Pingarrón
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 3.  Serum tests for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  James Creeden; Frank Junker; Sabine Vogel-Ziebolz; Douglas Rex
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Genetic tests and genomic biomarkers: regulation, qualification and validation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Novelli; Cinzia Ciccacci; Paola Borgiani; Marisa Papaluca Amati; Eric Abadie
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  Biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Tanaka; Mayu Tanaka; Takahiro Tanaka; Rikako Ishigamori
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Innovations, challenges and future prospects of oncoproteomics.

Authors:  Kewal K Jain
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  An integrative framework identifies alternative splicing events in colorectal cancer development.

Authors:  Andrea Bisognin; Silvia Pizzini; Lisa Perilli; Giovanni Esposito; Simone Mocellin; Donato Nitti; Paola Zanovello; Stefania Bortoluzzi; Susanna Mandruzzato
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Cell surface markers in colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Jerry Zhou; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer: possible improvements by risk assessment evaluation?

Authors:  Hans J Nielsen; Karen V Jakobsen; Ib J Christensen; Nils Brünner
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  Systems-level biomarkers identification and drug repositioning in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hande Beklen; Esra Yildirim; Medi Kori; Beste Turanli; Kazim Yalcin Arga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.