Literature DB >> 17938383

Self-measurement of blood pressure at home reduces the need for antihypertensive drugs: a randomized, controlled trial.

Willem J Verberk1, Abraham A Kroon, Jacques W M Lenders, Alfons G H Kessels, Gert A van Montfrans, Andries J Smit, Paul-Hugo M van der Kuy, Patricia J Nelemans, Roger J M W Rennenberg, Diederick E Grobbee, Frank W Beltman, Manuela A Joore, Daniëlle E M Brunenberg, Carmen Dirksen, Theo Thien, Peter W de Leeuw.   

Abstract

It is still uncertain whether one can safely base treatment decisions on self-measurement of blood pressure. In the present study, we investigated whether antihypertensive treatment based on self-measurement of blood pressure leads to the use of less medication without the loss of blood pressure control. We randomly assigned 430 hypertensive patients to receive treatment either on the basis of self-measured pressures (n=216) or office pressures (OPs; n=214). During 1-year follow-up, blood pressure was measured by office measurement (10 visits), ambulatory monitoring (start and end), and self-measurement (8 times, self-pressure group only). In addition, drug use, associated costs, and degree of target organ damage (echocardiography and microalbuminuria) were assessed. The self-pressure group used less medication than the OP group (1.47 versus 2.48 drug steps; P<0.001) with lower costs ($3222 versus $4420 per 100 patients per month; P<0.001) but without significant differences in systolic and diastolic OP values (1.6/1.0 mm Hg; P=0.25/0.20), in changes in left ventricular mass index (-6.5 g/m(2) versus -5.6 g/m(2); P=0.72), or in median urinary microalbumin concentration (-1.7 versus -1.5 mg per 24 hours; P=0.87). Nevertheless, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure values at the end of the trial were higher in the self-pressure than in the OP group: 125.9 versus 123.8 mm Hg (P<0.05) for systolic and 77.2 versus 76.1 mm Hg (P<0.05) for diastolic blood pressure. These data show that self-measurement leads to less medication use than office blood pressure measurement without leading to significant differences in OP values or target organ damage. Ambulatory values, however, remain slightly elevated for the self-pressure group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938383     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.094193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  33 in total

1.  Using mHealth for the management of hypertension in UK primary care: an embedded qualitative study of the TASMINH4 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sabrina Grant; James Hodgkinson; Claire Schwartz; Peter Bradburn; Marloes Franssen; Fd Richard Hobbs; Sue Jowett; Richard J McManus; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.801

3.  Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications.

Authors:  S B Nikolic; W P Abhayaratna; R Leano; M Stowasser; J E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joji Ishikawa; Deirdre J Carroll; Sujith Kuruvilla; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Practical Aspects of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Aldo J Peixoto
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring and physician care in reducing office blood pressure.

Authors:  Yoon-Nyun Kim; Dong Gu Shin; Sungha Park; Chang Hee Lee
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 7.  Economics of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Verughese Jacob; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Krista K Proia; David P Hopkins; Jeffrey Reynolds; Anilkrishna B Thota; Christopher D Jones; Daniel T Lackland; Kimberly J Rask; Nicolaas P Pronk; John M Clymer; Ron Z Goetzel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Home blood pressure monitoring: primary role in hypertension management.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Anastasios Kollias; Marilena Zeniodi; Nikos Karpettas; Angeliki Ntineri
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 10.  Home monitoring of blood pressure.

Authors:  Barry P McGrath
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.