Literature DB >> 17937057

Reliability and validity of the power-mobility community driving assessment.

Lori Letts1, Deirdre Dawson, Irit Bretholz, Ethel Kaiserman-Goldenstein, Janet Gleason, Elke McLellan, Linda Norton, Carin Roth.   

Abstract

The Power-Mobility Community Driving Assessment (PCDA) is a performance-based measure designed to assess driving performance of individuals using power wheelchairs or scooters in community environments. This article reports the results of pilot testing and an evaluation of the assessment's reliability and validity. Pilot testing was conducted with a random selection of Canadian occupational therapists working in the area of mobility. Although the response rate was very low, feedback confirmed the utility of the measure and contributed to one substantive scoring revision. Reliability and validity testing was conducted with a sample of 34 drivers. Internal consistency results were positive. Interrater reliability was fair to high but limited by the lack of variability in the scores. Construct validity hypotheses were tested on the relationships between PCDA scores and vision, perception, cognition, and environmental accessibility. Results indicated no relationships between the PCDA and perceptual and cognitive function and only a weak trend for a relationship with environmental accessibility. Concurrent validity was established: PCDA scores were positively associated with the judgments of therapists familiar with the driving performance of participants. In summary, the PCDA has moderate to good reliability, and content and concurrent validity results were found. More research is needed, particularly on the underlying constructs of successful driving performance. At this point, rehabilitation professionals and their clients are urged to use this assessment to establish driving performance rather than relying on assessments of perception, cognition, or environmental accessibility to predetermine whether someone will receive power mobility. Clinicians may find this a useful tool to identify where clients are able to drive safely in community settings, to identify specific learning needs, and, through those, to promote independent living for drivers of power-mobility devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17937057     DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2007.10131872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assist Technol        ISSN: 1040-0435


  6 in total

1.  Motorised mobility scooters; upper limb fractures in elderly novice users.

Authors:  Colin G Murphy; Ian G Murphy; Kieran S O'Rourke; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-05

Review 2.  Motorized mobility scooters: the use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults - a mini-review.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Matthew Bunting; Carol Howe; Jane Mohler; Jonathan Sprinkle; Bijan Najafi
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.140

3.  Assessment of wheelchair driving performance in a virtual reality-based simulator.

Authors:  Harshal P Mahajan; Brad E Dicianno; Rory A Cooper; Dan Ding
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Estimation of Steering and Throttle Angles of a Motorized Mobility Scooter with Inertial Measurement Units for Continuous Quantification of Driving Operation.

Authors:  Jun Suzurikawa; Shunsuke Kurokawa; Haruki Sugiyama; Kazunori Hase
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  SWADAPT1: assessment of an electric wheelchair-driving robotic module in standardized circuits: a prospective, controlled repeated measure design pilot study.

Authors:  Emilie Leblong; Bastien Fraudet; Louise Devigne; Marie Babel; François Pasteau; Benoit Nicolas; Philippe Gallien
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Views of wheelchair users and caregivers regarding a passive safety monitoring system for electric powered wheelchair operators with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  William D Kearns; Adam J Becker; John P Condon; Victor Molinari; Ardis Hanson; William Conover; James L Fozard
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2019-11-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.