Literature DB >> 17934849

Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies for diagnosing celiac disease.

Spencer D Dorn1, David B Matchar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare strategies for diagnosing celiac disease (CD).
METHODS: A decision analytic model was used to compare five strategies on diagnostic performance and costs.
RESULTS: First, tTG screening alone is the least costly strategy ($22/individual). While the NPV is high (99.8%), the PPV is low (63.4%). Second, if tTG-positive patients undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to confirm CD, the PPV increases to 100% ($2,237/false-positive diagnosis avoided). Third, if EGDs are restricted to only those who are both tTG and HLA DQ2/8 positive, costs are slightly reduced ($59 vs. $63/individual), while PPV and NPV remain unchanged. Fourth, screening tTG-negative patients for IgA deficiency increases the NPV to 99.9% ($32,605/false-negative diagnosis avoided). Sensitivity analyses revealed that as the prevalence of CD increases, the cost of avoiding a false-positive diagnosis by adding EGD to the tTG alone strategy increases considerably.
CONCLUSIONS: When the pre-test probability of CD is low, patients with positive tTG serology should undergo EGD with biopsy-either directly or after positive screening for HLA DQ2/8-to confirm CD. As the pre-test probability of CD increases, the added cost of EGD should be weighed against the consequences of a false-positive diagnosis. Routinely screening for IgA deficiency in order to avoid a false-negative diagnosis is quite costly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934849     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-9939-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  37 in total

1.  Evaluating evidence from a decision analysis.

Authors:  S D Ramsey
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Biopsy is the gold standard of diagnosis of celiac sprue.

Authors:  J A Murray; P H Green
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  [Frequency of selective IgA deficiency in Basque Country].

Authors:  M A Pérez Vaquero; M A Vesga Carasa; A López Urrutia
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2000-09-23       Impact factor: 1.725

4.  This month at the NIH: Final statement of NIH Consensus Conference on celiac disease.

Authors:  Stephen P James
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Catherine Dubé; Alaa Rostom; Richmond Sy; Ann Cranney; Navaaz Saloojee; Chantelle Garritty; Margaret Sampson; Li Zhang; Fatemeh Yazdi; Vasil Mamaladze; Irene Pan; Joanne Macneil; David Mack; Dilip Patel; David Moher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Is coeliac disease screening in risk groups justified? A fourteen-year follow-up with special focus on compliance and quality of life.

Authors:  M Viljamaa; P Collin; H Huhtala; H Sievänen; M Mäki; K Kaukinen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  The impact of a gluten-free diet on adults with coeliac disease: results of a national survey.

Authors:  M Zarkadas; A Cranney; S Case; M Molloy; C Switzer; I D Graham; J D Butzner; M Rashid; R E Warren; V Burrows
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.089

8.  Prevalence of selective IgA deficiency in Spain: more than we thought.

Authors:  L F Pereira; A M Sapiña; J Arroyo; J Viñuelas; R M Bardají; L Prieto
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alaa Rostom; Catherine Dubé; Ann Cranney; Navaaz Saloojee; Richmond Sy; Chantelle Garritty; Margaret Sampson; Li Zhang; Fatemeh Yazdi; Vasil Mamaladze; Irene Pan; Joanne MacNeil; David Mack; Dilip Patel; David Moher
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England.

Authors:  M A Quine; G D Bell; R F McCloy; H R Matthews
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Screening for celiac disease in average-risk and high-risk populations.

Authors:  Saurabh Aggarwal; Benjamin Lebwohl; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Implementation of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance to measure immunoglobulin A with all coeliac screens: can an affordable solution be devised?

Authors:  D J Mac Lochlainn; R Hira-Kazal; H Varney; J Maher
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  The economics of coeliac disease: a population-based study.

Authors:  K H Long; A Rubio-Tapia; A E Wagie; L J Melton; B D Lahr; C T Van Dyke; J A Murray
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Resource use and costs associated with coeliac disease before and after diagnosis in 3,646 cases: results of a UK primary care database analysis.

Authors:  Mara Violato; Alastair Gray; Irini Papanicolas; Melissa Ouellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.