Literature DB >> 7613903

Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England.

M A Quine1, G D Bell, R F McCloy, H R Matthews.   

Abstract

After cardiopulmonary complications, perforation is the second most important cause of complications following flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A recent audit of 14,149 procedures detected a perforation rate of 0.05 per cent (overall mortality rate 0.008 per cent) during diagnostic endoscopy, and a perforation rate of 2.6 per cent (overall mortality rate 1.0 per cent) following oesophageal intubation or dilatation. The incidence of perforation following both diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has not changed over the past 10 years. The risk factors are numerous but this audit demonstrated that inexperience increases the likelihood of perforation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7613903     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800820430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  28 in total

1.  Circumcision using bipolar diathermy scissors: a simple, safe and acceptable new technique.

Authors:  I D Fraser; J Tjoe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Investigation and management of chronic dysphagia.

Authors:  Paula Leslie; Paul N Carding; Janet A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

3.  Investigating and managing chronic dysphagia: dysphagia should prompt urgent gastroenterological referral.

Authors:  Hal L Spencer; Stuart Riley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-24

4.  Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice.

Authors:  S A Riley; S E A Attwood
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Endoscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Gerard P Rafferty; Tony Ck Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-16

Review 6.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Development of a novel esophageal stricture simulation.

Authors:  Adam V Haycock; James E East; David Swain; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  [Benign diseases of the esophagogastric junction: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge].

Authors:  J Jähne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Wei Keith Tan; Katie Lehovsky; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Tara Nuckcheddy; Susan Moist; Sudarshan Kadri; Massimiliano di Pietro; Alex Boussioutas; Nicholas J Shaheen; David A Katzka; Evan S Dellon; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound staging of stenotic esophageal cancers may be unnecessary to determine the need for neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Stephanie G Worrell; Daniel S Oh; Christina L Greene; Steven R Demeester; Jeffrey A Hagen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.