Literature DB >> 17934164

Laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury after prolonged use of the ProSeal LMA in a porcine model: a pilot study.

Kai Goldmann1, Joerg Dieterich, Marion Roessler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about the potential for the cuff of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) to cause laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of prolonged exposure of the laryngopharyngeal mucosa to the PLMA in an animal model.
METHODS: The PLMA was used for positive pressure ventilation in eight German country pigs randomized to receive different durations of anesthesia lasting three to 24 hr. Two additional pigs served as controls. Biopsies from 14 predetermined areas of the laryngopharyngeal mucosa were examined histopathologically using light microscopy. The number of areas with signs of mucosal damage was evaluated, and the degree of tissue damage was analyzed using a semiquantitative scoring system.
RESULTS: The number of areas with moderate to severe mucosal damage was 0-2 in animals anesthetized for less than 12 hr, 6 in animals anesthetized for 12-18 hr, and 12 in animals anesthetized for more than 18 hr. The severity of mucosal damage was also time-dependent, indicated by raising semiquantitative scores for epithelial and subepithelial mucosal damage.
CONCLUSION: The histopathological findings of this study show that prolonged use of the PLMA in the pig for up to nine hours is associated with no, or only mild alterations in the laryngopharyngeal mucosa, whereas use for 12 hr or more is associated with clear signs of mucosal injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934164     DOI: 10.1007/bf03021710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Extraglottic airway devices in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  S G Russo; O Moerer; E A Nickel; B Goetze; A Timmermann; M Quintel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Second generation laryngeal masks : expanded indications].

Authors:  A Timmermann; E A Nickel; F Pühringer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  The effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy probe insertion on the intracuff pressure of airway devices in children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Onur Balaban; Mineto Kamata; Mumin Hakim; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine.

Authors:  Pavel Michalek; William Donaldson; Eliska Vobrubova; Marek Hakl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of Arndt-endobronchial blocker plus laryngeal mask airway with left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube in one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Z J Zhang; M L Zheng; Y Nie; Z Q Niu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  A novel combination of the Arndt endobronchial blocker and the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ provides one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Qiong Li; Peiying Li; Jianghui Xu; Huahua Gu; Qinyun Ma; Liewen Pang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  Advantages, Disadvantages, Indications, Contraindications and Surgical Technique of Laryngeal Airway Mask.

Authors:  Anubhav Jannu; Ashim Shekar; Ramdas Balakrishna; H Sudarshan; G C Veena; S Bhuvaneshwari
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-12-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.