MOTIVATION: One bottleneck in high-throughput protein crystallography is interpreting an electron-density map, that is, fitting a molecular model to the 3D picture crystallography produces. Previously, we developed ACMI (Automatic Crystallographic Map Interpreter), an algorithm that uses a probabilistic model to infer an accurate protein backbone layout. Here, we use a sampling method known as particle filtering to produce a set of all-atom protein models. We use the output of ACMI to guide the particle filter's sampling, producing an accurate, physically feasible set of structures. RESULTS: We test our algorithm on 10 poor-quality experimental density maps. We show that particle filtering produces accurate all-atom models, resulting in fewer chains, lower sidechain RMS error and reduced R factor, compared to simply placing the best-matching sidechains on ACMI's trace. We show that our approach produces a more accurate model than three leading methods--Textal, Resolve and ARP/WARP--in terms of main chain completeness, sidechain identification and crystallographic R factor. AVAILABILITY: Source code and experimental density maps available at http://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/machine-learning/shavlik-group/programs/acmi/
MOTIVATION: One bottleneck in high-throughput protein crystallography is interpreting an electron-density map, that is, fitting a molecular model to the 3D picture crystallography produces. Previously, we developed ACMI (Automatic Crystallographic Map Interpreter), an algorithm that uses a probabilistic model to infer an accurate protein backbone layout. Here, we use a sampling method known as particle filtering to produce a set of all-atom protein models. We use the output of ACMI to guide the particle filter's sampling, producing an accurate, physically feasible set of structures. RESULTS: We test our algorithm on 10 poor-quality experimental density maps. We show that particle filtering produces accurate all-atom models, resulting in fewer chains, lower sidechain RMS error and reduced R factor, compared to simply placing the best-matching sidechains on ACMI's trace. We show that our approach produces a more accurate model than three leading methods--Textal, Resolve and ARP/WARP--in terms of main chain completeness, sidechain identification and crystallographic R factor. AVAILABILITY: Source code and experimental density maps available at http://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/machine-learning/shavlik-group/programs/acmi/
Authors: Gyorgy Snell; Carl Cork; Robert Nordmeyer; Earl Cornell; George Meigs; Derek Yegian; Joseph Jaklevic; Jian Jin; Raymond C Stevens; Thomas Earnest Journal: Structure Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: John L Markley; David J Aceti; Craig A Bingman; Brian G Fox; Ronnie O Frederick; Shin-ichi Makino; Karl W Nichols; George N Phillips; John G Primm; Sarata C Sahu; Frank C Vojtik; Brian F Volkman; Russell L Wrobel; Zsolt Zolnai Journal: J Struct Funct Genomics Date: 2009-01-08