Literature DB >> 17932767

Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings.

Anita Bernhard1, Daniel Pohl, Michael Fried, Donald O Castell, Radu Tutuian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional esophageal manometry evaluating liquid swallows in the recumbent position measures pressure changes at a limited number of sites and does not assess motility during solid swallows in the physiologic upright position. AIM: To evaluate esophageal motility abnormalities during water and bread swallows in the upright and recumbent positions using high-resolution manometry (HRM).
METHODS: Thirty-two-channel HRM testing was performed using water (10 ml each) and bread swallows in the upright and recumbent positions. The swallows were considered normal if the distal peristaltic segment >30 mmHg was >5 cm, ineffective if the 30-mmHg pressure band was <5 cm, and simultaneous if the onset velocity of the 30 mmHg pressure band was >8 cm/s. Abnormal esophageal manometry was defined as the presence of > or =30% ineffective and/or > or =20% simultaneous contractions.
RESULTS: The data from 96 patients (48 F; mean age 51 years, range 17-79) evaluated for dysphagia (56%), chest pain (22%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (22%) were reviewed. During recumbent water swallows, patients with dysphagia, chest pain, and GERD had a similar prevalence of motility abnormalities. During upright bread swallows, motility abnormalities were more frequent (p = 0.01) in patients with chest pain (71%) and GERD (67%) compared to patients with dysphagia (37%).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating bread swallows in the upright position reveals differences in motility abnormalities overlooked by liquid swallows alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932767     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0014-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry.

Authors:  P Pouderoux; G Shi; R P Tatum; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry.

Authors:  M Fox; G Hebbard; P Janiak; J G Brasseur; S Ghosh; M Thumshirn; M Fried; W Schwizer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  S J Spechler; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Relationship between esophageal motility and transit in patients with type I diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  R H Holloway; M D Tippett; M Horowitz; A F Maddox; J Moten; A Russo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans.

Authors:  V W Sears; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction.

Authors:  M L Allen; W C Orr; M H Mellow; M G Robinson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Emerging Technologies for Esophageal Manometry and pH Monitoring.

Authors:  Donald O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-06

Review 3.  Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.

Authors:  Ishita Dhawan; Brendon O'Connell; Amit Patel; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Randomized controlled trial of transoral incisionless fundoplication vs. proton pump inhibitors for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Bart P L Witteman; Jose M Conchillo; Nicolaas F Rinsma; Bark Betzel; Andrea Peeters; Ger H Koek; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Normal Values of High-Resolution Manometry in Supine and Upright Positions in a Thai Population.

Authors:  Pitichote Hiranyatheb; Suriya Chakkaphak; Supphamat Chirnaksorn; Pattaraporn Lekhaka; Kaimuk Petsrikun; Kornkanok Somboonpun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Characterization of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Children Presenting With Dysphagia Using High-Resolution Manometry.

Authors:  Francis Edeani; Adeel Malik; Ajay Kaul
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-03

7.  The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Y Xiao; A Read; F Nicodème; S Roman; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies.

Authors:  Y Xiao; F Nicodème; P J Kahrilas; S Roman; Z Lin; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

10.  Esophageal motility after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Meng Li; Bin Lu; Lina Meng; Yihong Fan; Haibiao Bao
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.