Literature DB >> 17932361

Responses of biomarkers of folate and riboflavin status to folate and riboflavin supplementation in healthy and colorectal polyp patients (the FAB2 Study).

Hilary J Powers1, Marilyn H Hill, Mark Welfare, Alison Spiers, Wendy Bal, Jean Russell, Yvonne Duckworth, Eileen Gibney, Elizabeth A Williams, John C Mathers.   

Abstract

Epidemiologic data suggest that increasing folate intake may protect against colorectal cancer. Riboflavin may interact with folate to modulate the effect. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention study (the FAB2 Study) was carried out in healthy controls and patients with colorectal polyps (adenomatous and hyperplastic) to examine effects of folic acid and riboflavin supplements on biomarkers of nutrient status and on putative biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk (DNA methylation and DNA damage; to be reported elsewhere). Ninety-eight healthy controls and 106 patients with colorectal polyps were stratified for the thermolabile variant of methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase, MTHFR C677T, and were randomized to receive 400 microg of folic acid, 1,200 microg of folic acid, or 400 microg of folic acid plus 5 mg of riboflavin or placebo for 6 to 8 weeks. Blood samples and colon biopsy samples were collected for the measurement of biomarkers of folate and riboflavin status. Supplementation with folic acid elicited a significant increase in mucosal 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate, and a marked increase in RBC and plasma, with a dose-response. Measures of riboflavin status improved in response to riboflavin supplementation. Riboflavin supplement enhanced the response to low-dose folate in people carrying at least one T allele and having polyps. The magnitude of the response in mucosal folate was positively related to the increase in plasma 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate but was not different between the healthy group and polyp patients. Colorectal mucosal folate concentration responds to folic acid supplementation to an extent comparable to that seen in plasma, but with a suggestion of an upper limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932361     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  15 in total

1.  Serum adiponectin, leptin, C-peptide, homocysteine, and colorectal adenoma recurrence in the Polyp Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Gerd Bobe; Gwen Murphy; Connie J Rogers; Kenneth W Hance; Paul S Albert; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Leah B Sansbury; Elaine Lanza; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Mathematical modeling predicts the effect of folate deficiency and excess on cancer-related biomarkers.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; H Frederik Nijhout; Jesse F Gregory; Michael C Reed; S Jill James; Amy Liu; Barry Shane; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Relation between normal rectal methylation, smoking status, and the presence or absence of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Debra Kukuruga; Zhe Jin; Yuriko Mori; Yulan Cheng; Mark Duncan; Sanford A Stass; Elizabeth Montgomery; David Hutcheon; Stephen J Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Folate and fiber in the prevention of colorectal cancer: between shadows and the light.

Authors:  Wan Du; Wen-Ying Li; Rong Lu; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Riboflavin status modifies the effects of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) polymorphisms on homocysteine.

Authors:  Carlos J García-Minguillán; Joan D Fernandez-Ballart; Santiago Ceruelo; Lídia Ríos; Olalla Bueno; Maria Isabel Berrocal-Zaragoza; Anne M Molloy; Per M Ueland; Klaus Meyer; Michelle M Murphy
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.523

6.  Folate intake and bowel cancer risk.

Authors:  John C Mathers
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.523

7.  Inflammation-associated serum and colon markers as indicators of dietary attenuation of colon carcinogenesis in ob/ob mice.

Authors:  Roycelynn A Mentor-Marcel; Gerd Bobe; Kathleen G Barrett; Matthew R Young; Paul S Albert; Maurice R Bennink; Elaine Lanza; Nancy H Colburn
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-01

8.  Colorectal adenomas in a randomized folate trial: the role of baseline dietary and circulating folate levels.

Authors:  Jane C Figueiredo; A Joan Levine; Maria V Grau; Elizabeth L Barry; Per M Ueland; Dennis J Ahnen; Tim Byers; Robert S Bresalier; Robert W Summers; John Bond; Gail E McKeown-Eyssen; Robert S Sandler; Robert W Haile; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Biochemical validation of food frequency questionnaire-estimated carotenoid, alpha-tocopherol, and folate intakes among African Americans and non-Hispanic Whites in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lisa B Signorello; Maciej S Buchowski; Qiuyin Cai; Heather M Munro; Margaret K Hargreaves; William J Blot
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Systemic folate status, rectal mucosal folate concentration and dietary intake in patients at differential risk of bowel cancer (The FAB2 Study).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Williams; Mark Welfare; Alison Spiers; Marilyn H Hill; Wendy Bal; Eileen R Gibney; Yvonne Duckworth; Hilary J Powers; John C Mathers
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.