Literature DB >> 17932359

Knowledge and attitudes about microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Sharon L Manne1, Daniel C Chung, David S Weinberg, Hetal S Vig, Zohra Catts, Melissa Klein Cabral, Kristen Shannon, Neal J Meropol.   

Abstract

For individuals meeting Bethesda criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, the microsatellite instability (MSI) test is recommended as a screening evaluation before proceeding to genetic testing. The MSI test is new to the medical setting, but will be increasingly used to screen patients at high risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The main goals of this study were to examine knowledge about and exposure to the MSI test among individuals considering the test, to evaluate perceived benefits and barriers to undergoing the MSI test, and to identify the demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of the perceived benefits and barriers to undergoing the test. One hundred and twenty-five patients completed a survey after being offered the test, but prior to making the decision whether to pursue MSI testing. Results indicated low levels of knowledge about and previous exposure to the MSI test. Participants held positive attitudes about the potential benefits of the test and perceived few barriers to undergoing the test. Motivations were similar to those cited by individuals considering other genetic tests. Participants with nonmetastatic disease, with lower perceived risk for cancer recurrence, and who reported more self-efficacy endorsed more benefits from the test. Higher levels of cancer-specific psychological distress were associated with more perceived barriers to having the test. These findings suggest that individuals considering the MSI test know very little about it but hold positive attitudes about the test's utility. More distressed patients, patients who perceive themselves at higher risk for cancer recurrence, and patients with metastatic disease might be less motivated to have the MSI test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932359     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Stephanie Brooks; Johanna Loewenstein; Susannah Green; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Value of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer in a Probability-Based US Online Sample.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Ateesha F Mohamed; Deborah A Marshall; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips; Judith M E Walsh
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Facilitating informed decisions regarding microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Neal J Meropol; David S Weinberg; Hetal Vig; Zohra Ali-Khan Catts; Cheri Manning; Eric Ross; Kristen Shannon; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Preferences for genetic testing to identify hereditary colorectal cancer: perspectives of high-risk patients, community members, and clinicians.

Authors:  Judith Walsh; Millie Arora; Christina Hosenfeld; Uri Ladabaum; Miriam Kuppermann; Sara J Knight
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Effects of a decision support intervention on decisional conflict associated with microsatellite instability testing.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Sharon L Manne; Gary Winkel; Daniel S Chung; David S Weinberg; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Genetic testing and Parkinson disease: assessment of patient knowledge, attitudes, and interest.

Authors:  Dana Clay Falcone; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Sharon X Xie; Andrew Siderowf; Vivianna M Van Deerlin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Assessment of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer patients from Brazil.

Authors:  Sinara M O Leite; Karina B Gomes; Victor C Pardini; Alessandro C S Ferreira; Vanessa C Oliveira; Geraldo M G Cruz
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 8.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Engaging Patients in Precision Oncology: Development and Usability of a Web-Based Patient-Facing Genomic Sequencing Report.

Authors:  Ilana B Solomon; Sarah McGraw; Jenny Shen; Adem Albayrak; Gil Alterovitz; Melanie Davies; Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz; Rachel A Freedman; Lisa N Lopez; Lynette M Sholl; Eliezer Van Allen; Joanne Mortimer; Marwan Fakih; Sumanta Pal; Karen L Reckamp; Yuan Yuan; Stacy W Gray
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-14

Review 10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.