Literature DB >> 1792954

Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain.

T Tsubokawa1, Y Katayama, T Yamamoto, T Hirayama, S Koyama.   

Abstract

Twelve patients with deafferentation pain secondary to central nervous system lesions were subjected to chronic motor cortex stimulation. The motor cortex was mapped as carefully as possible and the electrode was placed in the region where muscle twitch of painful area can be observed with the lowest threshold. 5 of the 12 patients reported complete absence of previous pain with intermittent stimulation at 1 year following the initiation of this therapy. Improvements in hemiparesis was also observed in most of these patients. The pain of these patients was typically barbiturate-sensitive and morphine-resistant. Another 3 patients had some degree of residual pain but considerable reduction of pain was still obtained by stimulation. Thus, 8 of the 12 patients (67%) had continued effect of this therapy after 1 year. In 3 patients, revisions of the electrode placement were needed because stimulation became incapable of inducing muscle twitch even with higher stimulation intensity. The effect of stimulation on pain and capability of producing muscle twitch disappeared simultaneously in these cases and the effect reappeared after the revisions, indicating that appropriate stimulation of the motor cortex is definitely necessary for obtaining satisfactory pain control in these patients. None of the patients subjected to this therapy developed neither observable nor electroencephalographic seizure activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1792954     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9160-6_37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)


  79 in total

Review 1.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: A review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches.

Authors:  Soroush Zaghi; Nikolas Heine; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009-08

3.  Motor cortex stimulation in rats with chronic constriction injury.

Authors:  Simon Vaculín; Miloslav Franek; Anna Yamamotová; Richard Rokyta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Development of the Wireless Instantaneous Neurotransmitter Concentration System for intraoperative neurochemical monitoring using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bledsoe; Christopher J Kimble; Daniel P Covey; Charles D Blaha; Filippo Agnesi; Pedram Mohseni; Sidney Whitlock; David M Johnson; April Horne; Kevin E Bennet; Kendall H Lee; Paul A Garris
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Furmaga; Ela Plow; Hyun-Joo Park; Zhihong Chen; Grahame Kidd; Kenneth B Baker; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Yadong Ji; Pamela J Voulalas; Michael Keaser; Su Xu; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel Greenspan; Radi Masri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Phantom limb pain: low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in unaffected hemisphere.

Authors:  Andrea Di Rollo; Stefano Pallanti
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2011-05-11

10.  Analysis of high-perimeter planar electrodes for efficient neural stimulation.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.