Literature DB >> 17928383

Inequities in reporting asbestos-related lung cancer: influence of smoking stigma and physician's specialty, workload and role perception.

P Verger1, S Arnaud, S Ferrer, G Iarmarcovai, M-L Saliba, A Viau, M Souville.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study physician barriers to workers' compensation claims for asbestos-related cancers, focusing on smokers' stigma and physicians' speciality and role perception.
METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone study of 486 randomly-selected general practitioners (GPs) and pulmonologists in south-eastern France. Standardised questionnaires explored their behaviour, attitudes and practices in the field of occupational health and their responses to a case vignette of a lung cancer patient with long-term occupational asbestos exposure. Randomised subgroups of GPs and pulmonologists heard alternative versions varying only as regards the worker's smoking status. We studied factors associated with the recommendation that the case vignette patient file a compensation claim with simple and multiple logistic regressions.
RESULTS: The response rate was 64.4% among GPs and 62.5% among pulmonologists. Recommending the filing of an occupational disease claim was significantly associated in multiple logistic regressions with speciality (OR 4.46; 95% CI 2.38 to 8.37, for pulmonologists vs GPs), patient's smoking status (OR 3.15; 95% CI 2.11 to 4.70, for non-smokers vs smokers), physician's workload (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.88, for </=25 consultations per day vs >25) and role perception (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.22 to 3.27, for those who considered completing occupational disease medical certificates to be part of their role vs those who did not).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this French study appear applicable to various countries and contexts. To make physicians and especially GPs more aware of occupational health and smoking stigma, officials and educators must give these topics higher priority during initial training and continuing medical education. Tools and equipment that take time constraints into account should be developed and disseminated to help physicians manage occupational diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17928383     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.035808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

1.  Different reporting patterns for occupational diseases among physicians: a study of French general practitioners, pulmonologists and rheumatologists.

Authors:  Sandrine Arnaud; S Cabut; A Viau; M Souville; P Verger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Stigmatic and Sympathetic Attitudes Toward Cancer Patients Who Smoke: A Qualitative Analysis of an Online Discussion Board Forum.

Authors:  Christina M Luberto; Kelly A Hyland; Joanna M Streck; Brandon Temel; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  General practitioners and patients with psychological stress at work.

Authors:  M Souville; S Cabut; A Viau; G Iarmarcovai; S Arnaud; P Verger
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-22

4.  General practitioners' choices and their determinants when starting treatment for major depression: a cross sectional, randomized case-vignette survey.

Authors:  Hélène Dumesnil; Sébastien Cortaredona; Hélène Verdoux; Rémy Sebbah; Alain Paraponaris; Pierre Verger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Systematic Screening for Occupational Exposures in Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective French Cohort.

Authors:  Olivia Pérol; Barbara Charbotel; Lionel Perrier; Sandrine Bonnand; Elodie Belladame; Virginie Avrillon; Paul Rebattu; Frédéric Gomez; Géraldine Lauridant; Maurice Pérol; Beatrice Fervers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.