Christina M Luberto1,2, Kelly A Hyland3,4, Joanna M Streck5, Brandon Temel3,4, Elyse R Park. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; cluberto@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 4. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 5. Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A significant minority of patients continue to smoke after a cancer diagnosis. Cancer patients who smoke experience stigma that can negatively impact health outcomes. We explored publicly shared perspectives about cancer patients who continued to smoke post-diagnosis. METHODS: An online news article, published in January 2012, summarized the findings of smoking prevalence among patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium trial. In response, written comments were posted on the articles' public discussion board. Applying principles of grounded theory, we conducted a document analysis and established a conceptual framework to develop a model by which to explain factors underlying stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer survivors who continue to smoke. RESULTS: Personal experiences with cancer, smoking, and statistical literacy were found to influence beliefs about cancer and smoking, which in turn influenced stigmatic or sympathetic attitudes. More sympathetic attitudes were expressed by individuals who had personal experiences with smoking, believed cancer is multicausal, identified smoking as an addiction, or considered extrinsic factors responsible for smoking. Individuals who did not have personal experiences with cancer or smoking, had low statistical literacy, believed that smoking necessarily and directly causes cancer, and focused on intrinsic responsibilities for smoking tended to express more stigmatic attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings raise awareness and provide insight into stigma against cancer survivors who smoke and can help inform strategies for reducing stigma against this vulnerable group. IMPLICATIONS: This study helps raise awareness of stigma toward cancer patients who smoke and provides insight into the processes that may influence stigmatic as compared to sympathetic attitudes toward these patients. Results suggest that population-based strategies to educate the public regarding the nature of nicotine addiction, difficulty of quitting, and benefits of quitting for cancer patients may be useful for reducing stigma against cancer patients with a smoking history.
INTRODUCTION: A significant minority of patients continue to smoke after a cancer diagnosis. Cancerpatients who smoke experience stigma that can negatively impact health outcomes. We explored publicly shared perspectives about cancerpatients who continued to smoke post-diagnosis. METHODS: An online news article, published in January 2012, summarized the findings of smoking prevalence among patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer enrolled in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium trial. In response, written comments were posted on the articles' public discussion board. Applying principles of grounded theory, we conducted a document analysis and established a conceptual framework to develop a model by which to explain factors underlying stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer survivors who continue to smoke. RESULTS: Personal experiences with cancer, smoking, and statistical literacy were found to influence beliefs about cancer and smoking, which in turn influenced stigmatic or sympathetic attitudes. More sympathetic attitudes were expressed by individuals who had personal experiences with smoking, believed cancer is multicausal, identified smoking as an addiction, or considered extrinsic factors responsible for smoking. Individuals who did not have personal experiences with cancer or smoking, had low statistical literacy, believed that smoking necessarily and directly causes cancer, and focused on intrinsic responsibilities for smoking tended to express more stigmatic attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings raise awareness and provide insight into stigma against cancer survivors who smoke and can help inform strategies for reducing stigma against this vulnerable group. IMPLICATIONS: This study helps raise awareness of stigma toward cancerpatients who smoke and provides insight into the processes that may influence stigmatic as compared to sympathetic attitudes toward these patients. Results suggest that population-based strategies to educate the public regarding the nature of nicotine addiction, difficulty of quitting, and benefits of quitting for cancerpatients may be useful for reducing stigma against cancerpatients with a smoking history.
Authors: Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Yolanda I Garces; Darrell R Schroeder; Liza M Nirelli; Gary A Croghan; Ivana T Croghan; Robert L Foote; Richard D Hurt Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Heidi A Hamann; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Lisa Carter-Harris; Jamie L Studts; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Joanna M Streck; Christina M Luberto; Alona Muzikansky; Sarah Skurla; Colin J Ponzani; Giselle K Perez; Daniel L Hall; Adam Gonzalez; Brittain Mahaffey; Nancy A Rigotti; Jamie S Ostroff; Elyse R Park Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-05-18
Authors: Jonathan B Bricker; Noreen L Watson; Jaimee L Heffner; Brianna Sullivan; Kristin Mull; Diana Kwon; Johann Lee Westmaas; Jamie Ostroff Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2020-01-17