BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Planning and evaluation models have been developed to assess the public health impact of health promotion interventions. However, few have been applied to health policies. There is an important need for models to help design and evaluate health policies. METHODS: This article applies the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) planning and evaluation framework to health policies. We provide definitions and application examples for different policies. RESULTS: As demonstrated by a case study, the RE-AIM dimensions and definitions can also apply to policies. Considerations regarding compliance and enforcement are presented to clarify the complex implementation dimension. CONCLUSIONS: The RE-AIM framework can be useful in estimating public health impact, comparing different health policies, planning policies designed for increased likelihood of success, and identifying areas for integration of policies with other health promotion strategies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Planning and evaluation models have been developed to assess the public health impact of health promotion interventions. However, few have been applied to health policies. There is an important need for models to help design and evaluate health policies. METHODS: This article applies the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) planning and evaluation framework to health policies. We provide definitions and application examples for different policies. RESULTS: As demonstrated by a case study, the RE-AIM dimensions and definitions can also apply to policies. Considerations regarding compliance and enforcement are presented to clarify the complex implementation dimension. CONCLUSIONS: The RE-AIM framework can be useful in estimating public health impact, comparing different health policies, planning policies designed for increased likelihood of success, and identifying areas for integration of policies with other health promotion strategies.
Authors: Lori A Pollack; Nikki A Hawkins; Brandy L Peaker; Natasha Buchanan; Betsy C Risendal Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Richard K Zimmerman; Anthony E Brown; Valory N Pavlik; Krissy K Moehling; Jonathan M Raviotta; Chyongchiou J Lin; Song Zhang; Mary Hawk; Shakala Kyle; Suchita Patel; Faruque Ahmed; Mary Patricia Nowalk Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rodney Lyn; Semra Aytur; Tobey A Davis; Amy A Eyler; Kelly R Evenson; Jamie F Chriqui; Angie L Cradock; Karin Valentine Goins; Jill Litt; Ross C Brownson Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2013 May-Jun