Literature DB >> 17926969

Calibration model of a dual gain flat panel detector for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.

C Schmidgunst1, D Ritter, E Lang.   

Abstract

The continuing research and further development in flat panel detector technology have led to its integration into more and more medical x-ray systems for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging, such as fixed or mobile C arms. Besides the obvious advantages of flat panel detectors, like the slim design and the resulting optimum accessibility to the patient, their success is primarily a product of the image quality that can be achieved. The benefits in the physical and performance-related features as opposed to conventional image intensifier systems, (e.g., distortion-free reproduction of imaging information or almost linear signal response over a large dynamic range) can be fully exploited, however, only if the raw detector images are correctly calibrated and postprocessed. Previous procedures for processing raw data contain idealizations that, in the real world, lead to artifacts or losses in image quality. Thus, for example, temperature dependencies or changes in beam geometry, as can occur with mobile C arm systems, have not been taken into account up to this time. Additionally, adverse characteristics such as image lag or aging effects have to be compensated to attain the best possible image quality. In this article a procedure is presented that takes into account the important dependencies of the individual pixel sensitivity of flat panel detectors used in 2D or 3D imaging and simultaneously minimizes the work required for an extensive recalibration. It is suitable for conventional detectors with only one gain mode as well as for the detectors specially developed for 3D imaging with dual gain read-out technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926969     DOI: 10.1118/1.2760024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Antiscatter grids in mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: effect on image quality and dose.

Authors:  S Schafer; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Automatic image-to-world registration based on x-ray projections in cone-beam CT-guided interventions.

Authors:  N M Hamming; M J Daly; J C Irish; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.

Authors:  S Schafer; S Nithiananthan; D J Mirota; A Uneri; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsena
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of flat panel-imager veiling glare on scatter-estimation accuracy and image quality of a commercial on-board cone-beam CT imaging system.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lazos; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Deformable registration of the inflated and deflated lung in cone-beam CT-guided thoracic surgery: initial investigation of a combined model- and image-driven approach.

Authors:  Ali Uneri; Sajendra Nithiananthan; Sebastian Schafer; Yoshito Otake; J Webster Stayman; Gerhard Kleinszig; Marc S Sussman; Jerry L Prince; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Soft-tissue imaging with C-arm cone-beam CT using statistical reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Yoshito Otake; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sebastian Vogt; Gary L Gallia; A Jay Khanna; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Low-dose preview for patient-specific, task-specific technique selection in cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Yoshito Otake; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; A Jay Khanna; Gary L Gallia; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Known-component 3D-2D registration for quality assurance of spine surgery pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  A Uneri; T De Silva; J W Stayman; G Kleinszig; S Vogt; A J Khanna; Z L Gokaslan; J-P Wolinsky; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs).

Authors:  Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.