Literature DB >> 17926146

Research in Danish cancer rehabilitation: social characteristics and late effects of cancer among participants in the FOCARE research project.

Mette Terp Høybye1, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Jane Christensen, Lone Ross Larsen, Katrin Gaardbo Kuhn, Jette Nygaard Jensen, Kathrine Carlsen, Christoffer Johansen.   

Abstract

Worldwide, the number of cancer survivors is increasing, owing to improvements in cancer therapy, resulting in an increased need to address the physical and mental sequelae of cancer. This paper introduces a Danish psychosocial cancer intervention and presents the baseline characteristics of the cancer survivors with respect to cancer site, sociodemographic variables, social network, lifestyle, self-rated health and the prevalence of cancer-related late effects. The study is part of the FOCARE research project, in which the long-term effects of the rehabilitation programme are evaluated systematically. The study is based on data from a self-administered baseline questionnaire filled in by 2 174 cancer survivors who registered for a 1-week, publicly paid rehabilitation retreat and were invited to participate in the FOCARE study in the period 25 November 2002 to 31 December 2005. The response rate at baseline was 86% (n = 1876). Most participants were younger women with breast cancer. They were generally well educated and working. The cancer survivors reported having comprehensive social networks and being physically active. Several cancer-related symptoms were reported by women with cancers at selected sites, of which fatigue was the most prevalent. More than half reported good-to-excellent self-rated health, while fair-to-poor health was reported by 40%, most of whom were survivors of lung (56%) and haematological (48%) cancers. The results indicate that Danish cancer survivors experience considerably reduced physical health, possibly as late physical effects of treatment. The problems reported by the cancer survivors suggest that cancer rehabilitation should include these aspects of living after cancer and take account of differences among cancer survivors with regard to cancer site, sex, age, family, working status and social position. These challenges might be addressed optimally in multi-dimensional rehabilitation programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17926146     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701418846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  19 in total

1.  Lifestyles of cancer survivors attending an inpatient educational program-a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gunhild M Gjerset; Jon H Loge; Sævar B Gudbergsson; Asta Bye; S D Fosså; Line M Oldervoll; Cecilie E Kiserud; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Lene Thorsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Fatigue trajectories during the first 8 months after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Hanne Bødtcher; Pernille Envold Bidstrup; Ingelise Andersen; Jane Christensen; Birgitte Goldschmidt Mertz; Christoffer Johansen; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Feasibility of a psychosocial rehabilitation intervention to enhance the involvement of relatives in cancer rehabilitation: pilot study for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Loni Ledderer; Karen la Cour; Ole Mogensen; Erik Jakobsen; René Depont Christensen; Jakob Kragstrup; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Nina Rottmann; Susanne O Dalton; Jane Christensen; Kirsten Frederiksen; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Modesty and recognition--a qualitative study of the lived experience of recovery from anal cancer.

Authors:  Julie Midtgaard; Mette Juel Hansen; Birgitte Grandjean
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the impact of cancer scale.

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Patricia A Ganz; Laura Petersen; Adrienne Castillo; Bette Caan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study.

Authors:  M T Høybye; S O Dalton; I Deltour; P E Bidstrup; K Frederiksen; C Johansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups.

Authors:  Mette Terp Høybye; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Jane Christensen; Lone Ross; Katrin Gaardbo Kuhn; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A systematic review of physical activity-based behaviour change interventions reaching men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Finlay; G Wittert; C E Short
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Type of hematological malignancy is crucial for the return to work prognosis: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Trine Allerslev Horsboel; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Bendt Nielsen; Chris Jensen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Annette de Thurah
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.