OBJECTIVES: Messages designed to motivate participation in physical activity usually emphasize the benefits of physical activity (gain-framed) as well as the costs of inactivity (loss-framed). The framing implications of prospect theory suggest that the effectiveness of these messages could be enhanced by providing gain-framed information only. We compared the effectiveness of gain-, loss-, and mixed-framed messages for promoting moderate to vigorous physical activity. DESIGN: Randomized trial. METHOD:Sedentary, healthy callers to the US National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service (N=322) receivedgain-, loss-, or mixed-framed messages on three occasions (baseline, Week 1, and Week 5). Social cognitive variables and self-reported physical activity were assessed at baseline, Week 2, and Week 9. Separate regression analyses were conducted to examine message effects at each assessment point. RESULTS: At Week 2, gain- and mixed-framed messages resulted in stronger intentions and greater self-efficacy than loss-framed messages. At Week 9, gain-framed messages resulted in greater physical activity participation than loss- or mixed-framed messages. Social cognitive variables at Week 2 did not mediate the Week 9 framing effects on physical activity participation. CONCLUSIONS: Using gain-framed messages exclusively may be a means of increasing the efficacy of physical activity materials.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Messages designed to motivate participation in physical activity usually emphasize the benefits of physical activity (gain-framed) as well as the costs of inactivity (loss-framed). The framing implications of prospect theory suggest that the effectiveness of these messages could be enhanced by providing gain-framed information only. We compared the effectiveness of gain-, loss-, and mixed-framed messages for promoting moderate to vigorous physical activity. DESIGN: Randomized trial. METHOD: Sedentary, healthy callers to the US National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service (N=322) received gain-, loss-, or mixed-framed messages on three occasions (baseline, Week 1, and Week 5). Social cognitive variables and self-reported physical activity were assessed at baseline, Week 2, and Week 9. Separate regression analyses were conducted to examine message effects at each assessment point. RESULTS: At Week 2, gain- and mixed-framed messages resulted in stronger intentions and greater self-efficacy than loss-framed messages. At Week 9, gain-framed messages resulted in greater physical activity participation than loss- or mixed-framed messages. Social cognitive variables at Week 2 did not mediate the Week 9 framing effects on physical activity participation. CONCLUSIONS: Using gain-framed messages exclusively may be a means of increasing the efficacy of physical activity materials.
Authors: Josefa L Martinez; Susan E Rivers; Lindsay R Duncan; Michelle Bertoli; Samantha Domingo; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Peter Salovey Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Benjamin A Toll; Steve Martino; Amy Latimer; Peter Salovey; Stephanie O'Malley; Shannon Carlin-Menter; Jessica Hopkins; Ran Wu; Paula Celestino; K Michael Cummings Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Amy E Latimer; Kaitlin E Green; Kristina Schmid; Jennifer Tomasone; Sara Abrams; K Michael Cummings; Paula Celestino; Peter Salovey; Srinivasa Seshadri; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2009-08-05
Authors: Carolyn J Barg; Amy E Latimer; Elizabeth A Pomery; Susan E Rivers; Tara A Rench; Harry Prapavessis; Peter Salovey Journal: Psychol Health Date: 2011-08-25
Authors: Rachel Hirschey; Isaac Lipkus; Lee Jones; Christopher Mantyh; Richard Sloane; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.172