Literature DB >> 17924894

A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery.

C W Cheung1, C L A Ying, W K Chiu, G T C Wong, K F J Ng, M G Irwin.   

Abstract

This randomised, double-blind study compared dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intravenous sedation during third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. Sixty patients received either dexmedetomidine (up to 1 microg x kg(-1)) or midazolam (up to 5 mg), which was infused until the Ramsay Sedation Score was four or the maximum dose limit was reached. Intra-operative vital signs, postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption, amnesia, and satisfaction scores for patients and surgeons, were recorded. Sedation was achieved by median (IQR (range)) doses of 47 microg (39-52 (25-76)) or 0.88 microg x kg(-1) (0.75-1.0 (0.6-1.0)) dexmedetomidine, and 3.6 mg (3.3-4.4 (1.9-5.0)) or 0.07 mg x kg(-1) (0.055-0.085 (0.017-0.12)) midazolam. Heart rate and blood pressure during surgery were lower in dexmedetomidine group. There was no significant difference in satisfaction or pain scores. Midazolam was associated with greater amnesia. Dexmedetomidine produces comparable sedation to midazolam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924894     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05230.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  27 in total

1.  Dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and midazolam for oral rehabilitation: a case report.

Authors:  Bill W S Kim; Robert M Peskin
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

2.  Intravenous Sedation in Arnold-Chiari Malformation With Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Yoshiki Shionoya; Eishi Nakamura; Takahiro Goi; Kiminari Nakamura; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

3.  A comparison of dexmedetomidine sedation with and without midazolam for dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Ryo Wakita; Hikaru Kohase; Haruhisa Fukayama
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

4.  Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molar: A Double-Blind Split Mouth Study.

Authors:  Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; Garima Aggarwal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures.

Authors:  Saumya Taneja; Anuj Jain
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Update on dexmedetomidine: use in nonintubated patients requiring sedation for surgical procedures.

Authors:  Mohanad Shukry; Jeffrey A Miller
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Sedation for Percutaneous Drainage of Hepatic Hydatid Cysts.

Authors:  Emine Nilgün Bavullu; Esra Aksoy; Ruslan Abdullayev; Nermin Göğüş; Doğan Dede
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-05-23

8.  Comparison of Clinical Effects of Dexketoprofen and Paracetamol Used for Analgesia in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Nuran Akıncı; Nurten Bakan; Gülşah Karaören; Senay Göksu Tomruk; Hacı Mehmet Sökmen; Yonca Yanlı; Mehmet Erdem Akçay
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-02-01

9.  Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation during endoscopy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Rui Sun; Ze-Bing Zheng; Ren Liao; Jin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam as a sedation agent with local anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Mishina; T Aiba; K Hiramatsu; Y Shibata; M Yoshihara; T Aoba; N Yamaguchi; T Kato
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.