Literature DB >> 17924787

Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio).

Carole Parron1, Christine Deruelle, Joël Fagot.   

Abstract

Humans apply complex conceptual judgments to point-light displays (PLDs) representing biological motion (BM), but how animals process this kind of display remains uncertain. Four baboons (Papio papio) were trained to discriminate BM from nonbiological motion PLDs using an operant computerized test system. Transfer tests were given after training with novel BM stimuli representing humans or baboons (Experiment 1), with inverted PLDs (Experiment 2), and with BM stimuli in which body parts had been spatially disorganized (Experiment 3). Very limited transfer was obtained with the novel and inverted displays in Experiments 1 and 2, but transfer was much higher after spatial disorganization in Experiment 3. It is suggested that the baboons did not retrieve and interpret the articulated shape of the human or monkey body from the BM PLD stimuli, but rather focused their attention on the configural properties of subparts of the stimuli. Limits in perceptual grouping and restricted abilities in picture-object equivalence might explain why the baboons did not map BM PLD displays onto what they represent. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924787     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  10 in total

1.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

2.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Comparative thanatology, an integrative approach: exploring sensory/cognitive aspects of death recognition in vertebrates and invertebrates.

Authors:  André Gonçalves; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Local Dot Motion, Not Global Configuration, Determines Dogs' Preference for Point-Light Displays.

Authors:  Carla J Eatherington; Lieta Marinelli; Miina Lõoke; Luca Battaglini; Paolo Mongillo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Gravity-Dependent Animacy Perception in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Xiaohan Ma; Xiangyong Yuan; Jiahuan Liu; Li Shen; Yiwen Yu; Wen Zhou; Zuxiang Liu; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish.

Authors:  Tomohiro Nakayasu; Eiji Watanabe
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Sociability modifies dogs' sensitivity to biological motion of different social relevance.

Authors:  Yuko Ishikawa; Daniel Mills; Alexander Willmott; David Mullineaux; Kun Guo
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Spontaneous Discriminative Response to the Biological Motion Displays Involving a Walking Conspecific in Mice.

Authors:  Takeshi Atsumi; Masakazu Ide; Makoto Wada
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Body inversion effect in monkeys.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.