Literature DB >> 17922854

Impact of prostate-specific antigen testing on the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 cancers.

Stephen A Boorjian1, R Jeffrey Karnes, Laureano J Rangel, Eric J Bergstralh, Igor Frank, Michael L Blute.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the clinical and pathological outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) have changed since the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for patients with Gleason 8-10 cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 584 men treated with RRP between 1988 and 2001 for pathological Gleason 8-10 tumours. Patients were divided for analysis by year of surgery, i.e. early (1988-93), mid (1994-97) and late PSA era (1998-2001). Survival rates after RRP were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the effect of clinicopathological factors on outcome was analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
RESULTS: The median preoperative PSA level decreased from 15 ng/mL in the early to 10 ng/mL in the late PSA era (P < 0.001), while the rate of organ-confined disease increased from 22.9% to 35.1% (P = 0.007). However, the 7-year biochemical recurrence-free (37% vs 45%, P = 0.087) and cancer-specific survival (89% to 91%, P = 0.73) did not change significantly from the early to the late PSA era. Increased preoperative PSA level (P < 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (P < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (P = 0.02) were associated with biochemical recurrence. Seminal vesicle invasion (P = 0.005), positive nodes (P < 0.001) and positive surgical margins (P = 0.03) predicted death from cancer.
CONCLUSION: Although the pathological features of Gleason 8-10 cancers have become more favourable over the PSA era, survival has not changed. This lack of improvement in clinical outcome probably reflects the inherent biological aggressiveness of these cancers. While RRP provides long-term cancer control in a subset of these patients, continued investigation of multi-modal treatment options is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922854     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07269.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  Evolution of the clinical presentation of men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Ashley E Ross; Misop Han; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Thomas J Guzzo; Misop Han; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jonathan I Epstein; Edward M Schaeffer; Mark Schoenberg; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Consensus statement on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk prostate cancer patients on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG.

Authors:  I Henríquez; A Rodríguez-Antolín; J Cassinello; C Gonzalez San Segundo; M Unda; E Gallardo; J López-Torrecilla; A Juarez; J Arranz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Rationale for and review of neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rana R McKay; Toni K Choueiri; Mary-Ellen Taplin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  The role of radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-09-27

Review 6.  Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lamont J Wilkins; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Dominic Grimberg; Eric A Klein; Brian F Chapin; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.