Q Dai1, M Xu, M Yao, B Sun. 1. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the main therapeutic effect of angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists is to decrease blood pressure, they also exert anti-inflammatory effects in the cardiovascular system. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated the inhibitory effect of AT1 antagonists on the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and its receptor C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) in rat monocytes and aortas. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHRs) were treated with the AT1 antagonists losartan or telmisartan for 4 weeks, and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKYs) were used as normotensive controls. Systolic arterial pressure was measured, and the number of macrophages in the aortic vessel wall was assessed by anti-ED-1 antibody immunolabelling. KEY RESULTS: Compared with WKYs, SHRs showed significantly increased ED-1 positive macrophages in the aortic wall, which were decreased after high doses of losartan or telmisartan. Low doses of losartan did not improve blood pressure significantly as did the high doses, but markedly decreased macrophage infiltration in the vessel wall. AT1 antagonists, particularly at high doses, improved aortic remodeling in SHR. At the molecular level, AT1 antagonists attenuated the expression of MCP-1 and CCR2 in the aorta and peripheral blood monocytes and lowered the serum level of MCP-1. In addition, Western blotting showed that AT1 antagonists inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt in mouse monocytes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AT1 antagonism inhibited vessel wall inflammation and inhibition of PI3K/Akt may be involved in the modulation of the MCP-1/CCR2 system by AT1 antagonists in SHRs.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the main therapeutic effect of angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists is to decrease blood pressure, they also exert anti-inflammatory effects in the cardiovascular system. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated the inhibitory effect of AT1 antagonists on the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and its receptor C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) in rat monocytes and aortas. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Spontaneous hypertensiverats (SHRs) were treated with the AT1 antagonists losartan or telmisartan for 4 weeks, and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKYs) were used as normotensive controls. Systolic arterial pressure was measured, and the number of macrophages in the aortic vessel wall was assessed by anti-ED-1 antibody immunolabelling. KEY RESULTS: Compared with WKYs, SHRs showed significantly increased ED-1 positive macrophages in the aortic wall, which were decreased after high doses of losartan or telmisartan. Low doses of losartan did not improve blood pressure significantly as did the high doses, but markedly decreased macrophage infiltration in the vessel wall. AT1 antagonists, particularly at high doses, improved aortic remodeling in SHR. At the molecular level, AT1 antagonists attenuated the expression of MCP-1 and CCR2 in the aorta and peripheral blood monocytes and lowered the serum level of MCP-1. In addition, Western blotting showed that AT1 antagonists inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt in mouse monocytes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AT1 antagonism inhibited vessel wall inflammation and inhibition of PI3K/Akt may be involved in the modulation of the MCP-1/CCR2 system by AT1 antagonists in SHRs.
Authors: M Usui; K Egashira; H Tomita; M Koyanagi; M Katoh; H Shimokawa; M Takeya; T Yoshimura; K Matsushima; A Takeshita Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Koyanagi; K Egashira; S Kitamoto; W Ni; H Shimokawa; M Takeya; T Yoshimura; A Takeshita Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Q Capers; R W Alexander; P Lou; H De Leon; J N Wilcox; N Ishizaka; A B Howard; W R Taylor Journal: Hypertension Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: M Gräfe; W Auch-Schwelk; A Zakrzewicz; V Regitz-Zagrosek; P Bartsch; K Graf; M Loebe; P Gaehtgens; E Fleck Journal: Circ Res Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Judith M Willemsen; Jan W Westerink; Geesje M Dallinga-Thie; Anton-Jan van Zonneveld; Carlo A Gaillard; Ton J Rabelink; Eelco J P de Koning Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Dennis Bruemmer; Alan R Collins; Grace Noh; Wei Wang; Mary Territo; Sarah Arias-Magallona; Michael C Fishbein; Florian Blaschke; Ulrich Kintscher; Kristof Graf; Ronald E Law; Willa A Hsueh Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Chen Chen; Yan Meng; Lei Wang; Hong-Xia Wang; Cui Tian; Guo-Dong Pang; Hui-Hua Li; Jie Du Journal: Immunology Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: Daniel P Regan; Jonathan W Coy; Kirti Kandhwal Chahal; Lyndah Chow; Jade N Kurihara; Amanda M Guth; Irina Kufareva; Steven W Dow Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Monica M Santisteban; Niousha Ahmari; Jessica Marulanda Carvajal; Michael B Zingler; Yanfei Qi; Seungbum Kim; Jessica Joseph; Fernando Garcia-Pereira; Richard D Johnson; Vinayak Shenoy; Mohan K Raizada; Jasenka Zubcevic Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sailesh C Harwani; Jason Ratcliff; Fayyaz S Sutterwala; Zuhair K Ballas; David K Meyerholz; Mark W Chapleau; Francois M Abboud Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 17.367