Literature DB >> 17921730

The current use and future trends of focal surgical therapy in the management of localized prostate cancer.

Al B Barqawi1, E David Crawford.   

Abstract

The current treatment algorithms for management of localized prostate cancer are mainly extirpative in nature. Treatment varies from expectant management to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. However, the ever-increasing emphasis on achieving the best survival benefit while better preserving quality of life, coupled with the introduction of new, safer, and efficacious minimally invasive ablative technologies, has led to the increased popularity of minimally invasive treatment (MIT). MIT refers to the use of a wide range of techniques for local target ablation of the prostate gland with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue. Currently these include cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound. However, other experimental technologies such as photodynamic therapy, interstitial prostate brachytherapy, and microwave and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation are also currently under investigation in early clinical trials. To date, the overall interim results for these relatively new modalities of treatment appear comparable to those for surgical and radiation therapies. However, randomized, controlled studies are needed to support use of these modalities as an alternative to surgery and radiation. In this review, we will address the current rationale for and knowledge of MIT with regard to its safety and efficacy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In addition, we will discuss future promising tools in MIT such as photodynamic therapy and the target focal therapy approach as a new trend for the treatment of organ-confined low-volume disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921730     DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318156eb99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  6 in total

Review 1.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer--a review of current status and future promise.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Doug Pendse; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-01

2.  Anterior tumors of the prostate: diagnosis and significance.

Authors:  Priya N Werahera; E David Crawford; Francisco G La Rosa; Kathleen C Torkko; Beth Schulte; Holly T Sullivan; Adrie van Bokhoven; M Scott Lucia; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 3.  Microwave tissue ablation: biophysics, technology, and applications.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Optimization of prostate cancer diagnosis by increasing the number of core biopsies based on gland volume.

Authors:  Priya N Werahera; Kathryn Sullivan; Francisco G La Rosa; Fernando J Kim; M Scott Lucia; Colin O'Donnell; Rameshwar S Sidhu; Holly T Sullivan; Beth Schulte; E David Crawford
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-10-20

6.  Current prostate biopsy protocols cannot reliably identify patients for focal therapy: correlation of low-risk prostate cancer on biopsy with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Philip Quann; David F Jarrard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.