Literature DB >> 17921185

Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy.

M C Genovese1, M Schiff, M Luggen, J-C Becker, R Aranda, J Teng, T Li, N Schmidely, M Le Bars, M Dougados.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept during 2 years of the ATTAIN (Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF INadequate responders) trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: Patients completing the 6-month, double-blind period were eligible to enter the long-term extension; patients received abatacept approximately 10 mg/kg, plus disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Safety and efficacy (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses, DAS28 (C-reactive protein), HAQ-DI, SF-36, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index, fatigue VAS) were assessed through 2 years.
RESULTS: 317 patients (218 from the abatacept and 99 from the placebo group) entered and 222 (70%) completed 18 months of long-term extension treatment. The incidence and type of adverse events were consistent between the double-blind and cumulative (double-blind plus long-term extension) periods. Rates of serious adverse events were 25.6 and 23.4 per 100 patient-years in the double-blind versus cumulative period. At 6 months and 2 years, using non-responder analyses, ACR responses in abatacept-treated patients were: ACR 20, 59.4% and 56.2%; ACR 50, 23.5% and 33.2%; ACR 70, 11.5% and 16.1%; HAQ-DI responses were 54.4% and 47.9%. At 6 months and 2 years, using post-hoc as-observed analyses, the percentage of patients (95% confidence interval) achieving DAS28 (C-reactive protein) low disease activity score (< or = 3.2) and DAS28 (C-reactive protein)-defined remission (< 2.6) increased from 18.3% (13.0, 23.5) to 32.0% (24.6, 39.4) and 11.1% (6.8, 15.3) to 20.3% (13.9, 26.6). Clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36, pain, fatigue and sleep problems were also maintained throughout the 2 years of abatacept treatment.
CONCLUSION: No unique safety observations were reported during open-label exposure. Improvements in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, physical function and health-related quality of life observed after 6 months, were maintained throughout the 2 years in this population with difficult-to-treat disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00124982.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921185     DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.074773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  86 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapy: concepts of pathogenesis and emerging treatments. Co-stimulation and T cells as therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Alison M Gizinski; David A Fox; Sujata Sarkar
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 2.  Anti-inflammatory treatment of uveitis with biologicals: new treatment options that reflect pathogenetic knowledge of the disease.

Authors:  Arnd Heiligenhaus; Stephan Thurau; Maren Hennig; Rafael S Grajewski; Gerhild Wildner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Advances in the medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Michelle Kahlenberg; David A Fox
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Cost-effectiveness modeling of abatacept versus other biologic agents in DMARDS and anti-TNF inadequate responders for the management of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anthony Russell; Ariel Beresniak; Louis Bessette; Boulos Haraoui; Proton Rahman; Carter Thorne; Ross Maclean; Danielle Dupont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Abatacept for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Special Focus on the Elderly.

Authors:  Martin Soubrier; Clement Lahaye; Zuzana Tatar
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Leveling the field in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapies: equal access for equal efficacy.

Authors:  Anthony S Russell; Wojtek P Olszynski; K S Davison; Cheryl Koehn; Boulos Haraoui
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Regulatory T cells as therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jonathan H Esensten; David Wofsy; Jeffrey A Bluestone
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Biologic interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Celia Almeida; Ernest H S Choy; Sarah Hewlett; John R Kirwan; Fiona Cramp; Trudie Chalder; Jon Pollock; Robin Christensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-06

9.  [Personalized medicine for rheumatoid arthritis : serological and clinical patient profiles to optimize B and T cell targeted therapy].

Authors:  E Feist; T Dörner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  [Rheumatoid arthritis today].

Authors:  N Leuchten; M Aringer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.